Economics 423 Exam 1, Professor
Steven Hackett, Fall 2007
Name (1 point): Answer Key (answers in italics) Pick any 2 questions you do NOT want to
answer and cross them out with a BIG X. Each of the remaining 33 questions
below is worth 3 points.
Do either Part 1 or Part 2 below:
Part 1: Only for students not
participating in the 4th unit lab

1. Clearly draw a parallel social-cost
supply curve that intersects the price axis at a value of $20 in the diagram
above. Show how negative externalities result in too much electricity consumed (Q)
at too low of price (P), relative to the socially optimal. Use arrows in your
diagram.
See dotted lines in
diagram above
2. Marginal external cost is
a constant $10 per megawatt-hour in question 1 above. If 40,000 megawatt-hours
of electricity are consumed per day in the “free market” equilibrium, then:
Total daily external cost in
the “free market” equilibrium = $400,000 = $10 x 40,000
3. Suppose that 25,000
megawatt-hours of electricity are consumed in the “socially optimal”
equilibrium in question 1 above. In the space below, very briefly explain the types
of actions or choices that consumers can make over time that would allow them
to reduce their consumption of coal-fired electricity by 15,000 megawatt-hours
per day.
·
Conserve
energy
·
Buy more
energy-efficient appliances and devices
·
If possible,
produce or buy renewable energy
4. Now suppose that marginal
external cost is a constant $30 per megawatt-hour, instead of $10. Using the
diagram above, if a $30 Pigouvian tax were to be
implemented, what would be the quantity of coal-fired electricity produced in
this market under socially optimal conditions?
Qso = 0 megawatt-hours per day. To see this, not e
that the social-cost supply curve will now intersect
the “y” axis at $40.
Part 2: Only for students participating in the
4th unit lab
Suppose that daily
electricity demand is given by the equation P = 100 – 0.002Q
Private-cost electricity supply
is given by the equation P = 20 + 0.002Q
Social-cost electricity supply
is given by the equation P = 60 + 0.002Q
Q is in megawatt-hours. Marginal external cost is $40 per
megawatt-hour.
1. Derive the numerical value
for equilibrium price, quantity, and true net gains from trade in the “free
market” equilibrium, assuming that firms can freely pollute without regulation
or reputational consequences. Please show your work.
P = $ 60 Q = 20,000 True net gains from trade = $ 0
2. Derive the numerical value
for equilibrium price, quantity, and true net gains from trade in the “socially
optimal” equilibrium, assuming that a Pigouvian tax
has fully internalized negative externalities, with tax funds used to offset
damage costs. Please show your work.
P = $ 80 Q
= 10,000 True net gains from
trade = $ 200,000
3. Tax incidence refers to
how the burden of a tax is shared among consumers and producers. Consumers
share the burden of the tax by way of higher prices. What percentage of the Pigouvian tax in question 2 above is the consumers’ burden,
and what percentage is the producers’ burden? Please show your work.
Consumer burden = 50 % Producer burden = 50 %
4. Suppose that a renewable source
of electricity could supply the market at a price of $70 per megawatt-hour.
This source would not be subject to the Pigouvian
tax. If the polluting source of electricity is subject to a Pigouvian
tax as in question 2 above, then electricity from which type of source will
prevail in the market?
Renewable energy
Polluting energy Cannot be determined
(circle one)
Part 3: All students
5. Which of the following, if
any, in the table below would usually cause equilibrium quantity and
equilibrium price to increase in a competitive market? (circle
any/all correct answers)
|
Inward shift in demand |
Internalizing a positive
externality |
|
Internalizing a negative
externality |
Outward shift in supply |
6. Which of the following, if
any, in the table below will likely result in fewer acres of farmland
being subdivided and converted into residential, commercial, or industrial
development? (circle any/all correct answers)
|
A new Ľ cent sales tax
to fund the purchase of conservation easements |
Stronger tax rebates
(benefits) for ag. land enrolled in Williamson Act
contracts |
|
A new law making it easier
for owners of agricultural land to subdivide and develop |
Cheap farm imports drive
farmers’ profits below zero |
7. True/False (circle
one): In general, an increase in overall demand for recycled materials will reduce
the equilibrium price of recycled materials, thereby making it more difficult
to cover the costs of recycling in rural areas with higher transportation
costs.
8. True/False (circle
one): PG&E strongly supported the deregulation of California’s electricity
system in the mid-1990’s so it could purchase relatively inexpensive wholesale
electricity and re-sell it at higher fixed retail prices to consumers.
9. True/False (circle
one): Additional recycling of low-value high-volume materials by recycling
centers in remote rural areas could be accomplished if the California
Integrated Waste Management Board provided subsidies to offset the higher cost
of transporting these recycled materials to large metropolitan markets.
10. True/False (circle
one): Enron and other energy traders were able to “game” the California energy
markets under deregulation because of California’s extensive use of long-term
contracts with fixed prices at that time, and because of a substantial excess
supply of surplus electricity generation capacity that was available during
periods of peak demand.
11. True/False (circle
one): Deregulation in California created a spot market for electric power
purchases, and required utilities like PG&E to sell off some of their
generating facilities in order to create a number of independent electric power
sellers. Market manipulation caused wholesale prices to rise above fixed retail
prices, resulting in PG&E’s bankruptcy.
12. True/False (circle
one): In well-functioning competitive markets for storable non-renewable
resources, if sellers anticipate future demand will rise substantially, sellers
will reduce current sales quantities and increase future sales quantities. This
will bring current and future prices into balance.
13. True/False (circle
one): In well-functioning competitive markets for non-renewable resources with
steady-state demand, constant marginal extraction costs, and positive discount
rates, resource prices will steadily decline over time.
14. True/False (circle
one): If there are three policy options for managing a parcel of National Park
land, then the opportunity cost of the preferred option is the value of the
next best alternative that must be given up if the preferred option is
selected.
15. True/False (circle
one): Scarcity means that an allocation choice must be made, and that an
opportunity cost must be incurred.
16. True/False (circle
one): A public policy that is Pareto efficient implies that while some
people are worse off, and perhaps some are unaffected, nobody is made
better off by the policy.
17. True/False (circle
one): Internalizing negative externalities may not immediately eliminate
pollution generated by the market, but it generally results in fewer emissions,
and will help “level the playing field” and improve the market viability of costly,
less-polluting alternatives over time.
18. True/False (circle
one): When positive externalities are internalized in a well-functioning,
competitive market, price reflects the social benefits of the good being bought
and sold, and not just the private benefits.
Part 4: All students. Clearly write the letter for the word or phrase (on the left) beside
the description (on the right) that matches it. Each word or phrase has at most
one uniquely correct match.
|
Word or Phrase |
Description |
|
A. Recyclable natural
resources |
19. _I_ The value of
the best option that has to be given up when a choice is made in the context
of scarcity. |
|
B. State (government)
property |
20. _Q_ The concept
underlying deontological ethics. |
|
C. Usufructuary
rights |
21. _H_ A policy that
internalizes negative externalities. |
|
D. Kaldor-Hicks
efficient |
22. _J_ This
efficiency criterion is satisfied when a policy option increases net social
utility and makes nobody worse off. |
|
E. Tragedy of the commons |
23. _R_ The gap
between price and marginal cost that occurs in competitive commodity markets
due to resource scarcity. |
|
F. Positive externality |
24. _N_ Occurs when
price is above equilibrium in a well-functioning competitive market. |
|
G. Buy too much |
25. _F_ An external
benefit generated from production and exchange and enjoyed without payment by
members of society. |
|
H. Pigouvian
tax |
26. _M_ According to
Locke, un-owned land becomes your property when, by “improving” the land, you
mix it with this. |
|
I. |
27. _G_ Consumers do
this in markets suffering from unresolved negative externalities because
price reflects marginal private cost rather than marginal social cost. |
|
J. Pareto efficient |
28. _A_ These often
have secondary markets where previously used resource competes with
"virgin" resource. |
|
K. Common property |
29. _K_ The property
rights regime in which the rights of access, withdrawal, management, and
exclusion are held in common by a group of proprietors. |
|
L. Law of diminishing
marginal returns |
30. _B_ The property
rights regime that describes the ownership of |
|
M. Your labor |
31. _C_ Certain use
and withdrawal rights to property that is owned by others. |
|
N. Excess supply |
32. _O_ Measure of
market inefficiency that represents lost (or negative) gains from trade when
quantity is too big or small. |
|
O. Deadweight (social) loss |
33. _E_ Occurs in a common-pool resource
under open access conditions due to self-interested appropriators. |
|
P. Consequentialism |
34. _V_ Internalizes positive externalities
by purchasing development rights. |
|
Q. Categorical imperative |
35. _L_ Occurs in the short run when the
marginal productivity of a variable input declines. |
|
R. Marginal profit |
|
|
S. High discount rates |
|
|
T. Demand curve |
|
|
U. Zoning |
|
|
V. Conservation easement |
|