Economics 423, Midterm
Examination #2, Spring 2001 – Professor Hackett
Name: ______________KEY___________________
Please provide the very best
answer to each of the questions below
PART
I: Short answer (3 questions, 8 points each, 24 points total). Be sure to
respond to each part of each question. Clearly label your answer to parts (a),
(b), (c), etc.
1.
(a) What two characteristics distinguish a common-pool resource (CPR) from
public goods or private goods? (b) What is the name of the externality that
lies at the heart of the Tragedy of the Commons, and very briefly describe how
it works. (c) What happens to Hotelling rents under Tragedy of the Commons? (d)
If an open access CPR is suffering from Tragedy of the Commons, what three
property rights regimes have been proposed as possible solutions?
(a) CPRs feature rivalry in consumption (subtractability),
unlike public goods. CPRs feature difficulty in limiting access and use by
others, whereas private goods can be made exclusive.
(b) Appropriation (or rule of capture) externality.
(c) They are dissipated (reduced or eliminated).
(d) Private, common, or government (state) property.
2.
(a) Carefully draw and fully label a diagram in the space below that shows the
equilibrium level of effective support in the political market for regulation.
(b) Carefully show how supply and/or demand changes, and how the equilibrium
level of effective support changes, if the opportunity cost of a legislator's
time spent supporting the regulation goes up.
(a) Draw a supply/demand diagram. The vertical axis is labeled
"political currency." The horizontal axis is labeled "quantity
of effective support." Show equilibrium level of effective support where
supply and demand cross.
(b) The supply curve will shift inwards since the opportunity
cost of supplying a given level of effective support has increased. Therefore the equilibrium level of effective support will decline.
3.
(a) What type of willingness-to-pay values can be estimated using contingent
valuation that cannot be estimated using travel cost? (b) Suppose that relative
to a perfectly safe occupation, the labor market provides a $2000/year wage
premium for jobs in which the annual risk of accidental on-the-job death is 1
in 1000. Based on this data, what is the economic value of a statistical life?
(c) Based on your lecture outlines, briefly describe embedding bias and
how it undermines confidence in one of the nonmarket valuation methods. (d)
Suppose that environmental regulation raises firms' fixed costs in an industry.
If market demand for their product remains unchanged, what will be the impact
of higher fixed costs on industry structure?
(a) Non-use values (or passive use, such as existence values)
(b) VSL = (wage premium)/(increased probability of death) =
$2000/0.001 = $2 million.
(c) The embedding effect occurs when willingness-to-pay
responses for the particular good (ex: protecting the mountain lake) are
approximately equal to the willingness-to-pay responses for the more inclusive
good (ex: protecting an entire mountainous region that includes the lake as a
small component of the whole).
(d) Higher fixed costs for a firm means that either (i) the firm
must raise prices and sell the same quantity, or (ii) keep prices the same and
sell a larger quantity. If all firms raise price and market demand remains
constant, then total market sales volume will fall, meaning that some firms
will have to leave the industry. If price remains the same but firms all try to
increase quantity sold, and market demand remains constant, then some firms
will be unable to increase sales and will have to leave the industry. Either
way, industry structure becomes more concentrated--fewer firms competing
against one another.
PART
II: Matching (13 matches, 3 points each, 39 points total). There is one uniquely
correct match that connects a word or phrase on the left with a description on
the right. Only clear and unambiguous answers can be marked as correct.
|
Word or Phrase |
Description |
|
a. Rule of capture externality |
__l__ Rule structures that determine whether the equilibrium level of effective support is sufficient for environmental legislation to become law. |
|
b. Marginal benefit equals marginal cost |
__i__ This relationship between price and marginal cost occurs for a very scarce and valuable resource with low marginal cost and traded in a competitive market. |
|
c. Incentive not to comply with environmental regulation |
__a__ The external cost imposed on other fishers when one fisherman lands a large haul of fish on his deck. |
|
d. Indirect costs of environmental regulation |
__n__ Environmental valuation technique that infers the value of environmental qualities (such as nearby parks) that are bundled together with things (such as houses) that are traded in markets. |
|
e. Ecosystem services not traded in markets |
__b__ Occurs at the level of pollution control where total net benefits are maximized. |
|
f. Incentive to comply with environmental regulation |
__j__ Refers to pollution abatement and control expenditures paid by firms, consumers, and government. |
|
g. Total benefit equals total cost |
__e__ There is no rising market price to indicate when these become increasingly scarce. |
|
h. Demand for regulation increases |
__k__ Occurs when individual fishers race to land as many fish as possible during a limited season opening. |
|
i. Large marginal Hotelling rents |
__f__ . Exists when the cost savings from being out of compliance with environmental law are smaller than the expected penalty. |
|
j. Direct compliance costs |
__h__ This will happen when an additional environmental group joins the coalition of interest groups lobbying for an environmental regulation. |
|
k. Derby effects |
__r__ This fishery management tool can reduce or eliminate the race for fish. |
|
l. Political institutions |
__s__ The condition that holds when two or more things can be measured on the same scale. |
|
m. Demand for regulation decreases |
__g__ Occurs at the level of pollution control where total net benefits are zero. |
|
n. Hedonic regression method |
|
|
o. Natural resources traded in well-functioning competitive markets |
|
|
p. Brief fishing seasons |
|
|
q. Small marginal Hotelling rents |
|
|
r. Individual transferable quotas |
|
|
s. Commensurate |
|
PART III. Computational analysis (3 questions, 12 or 13
points each, 37 points total)
1.
Suppose that there are 100 units of a nonrenewable resource available over two
periods (0 and 1). Demand in each period is given by P = 100 - 0.5Q. Marginal
cost is a constant 20 in both periods. The discount rate is 30 percent.
a.
(3 points) Which of the following is the dynamically efficient allocation of
this resource? (clearly circle one answer):
b.
(4 Points) Prove your answer to part "a" above is right by deriving
Hotelling's rule for the answer that you circled. Show your work.
Yr 0: P = 100 - 0.5*64.35 = $67.825; PDV(P-MC) = $(67.825 - 20)/1.30 = $47.825
Yr 1: P = 100 - 0.5*35.65 = $82.175; PDV(P-MC) = $(82.175 - 20)/1.31 = $47.825
c.
(3 points) Now suppose that the discount rate becomes zero, but demand and
marginal cost remain the same. Determine the dynamically efficient allocation
of this resource over the two time periods.
Year
0: ___50___ Year 1: ___50___
d.
(3 points) Prove your answer to part "c" above is right by deriving
Hotelling's rule for the answer that you wrote down. Show your work.
Yr 0: P = 100 - 0.5*50 = $75;
PDV(P-MC) = $(75 - 20)/1.00 = $55
Yr 1: P = 100 - 0.5*50 = $75;
PDV(P-MC) = $(75 - 20)/1.01 = $55
2.
Suppose that a risk-neutral firm can save $10 million per year in compliance
costs by not complying with environmental regulations.
a.
(6 points) Suppose that the probability of the infraction being detected by
field monitors is 70 percent, and that the probability of a judge imposing the
statutory penalty given detection is 50 percent. If the statutory penalty calls
for a fine equal to double the annual cost savings, will this monitoring and
enforcement system create deterrence? Show your work.
Expected penalty: 0.7 * 0.5 * $20 million = $7 million.
Cost savings: $10 million.
Since the expected penalty is less than the cost savings, there
is no deterrence.
b.
(6 points) Given the information above, what is the minimum statutory penalty that
would be just sufficient to create deterrence? Show your work.
0.7 * 0.5 * X = $10 million
X = $10 million/0.35 = $28.572 million is absolute minimum.
3.
The data in the table below refers to pollution emissions and marginal
pollution abatement cost per ton in an industry. Total industry-wide emissions
are to be reduced by 50 percent (2400 tons/year):
|
Firms |
Historical
Emissions (Tons/Yr) |
Marginal
Abatement Cost ($/Ton) |
Allowances
Bought |
Allowances
Sold |
Total
Abatement Cost (No Tradable Allowances) |
Total
Abatement Cost (Tradable Allowances) |
|
Alkyone |
600 |
10 |
|
300 |
$3000 |
$6000 |
|
Merope |
600 |
20 |
|
300 |
$6000 |
$12000 |
|
Kelaino |
600 |
30 |
|
300 |
$9000 |
$18000 |
|
Elektra |
600 |
40 |
|
300 |
$12000 |
$24000 |
|
Sterope |
800 |
50 |
400 |
|
$20000 |
|
|
Taygete |
800 |
60 |
400 |
|
$24000 |
|
|
Maia |
800 |
70 |
400 |
|
$28000 |
|
a.
(6 points) Suppose that the regulatory target of cutting total emissions by 50
percent is accomplished with a command-and-control regulatory system that
requires each firm to cut its emissions by 50 percent. Correctly fill in the
"total abatement cost" column for "no tradable allowances"
in the table above.
b.
(6 points) Now suppose that the regulatory target of cutting total emissions by
50 percent is accomplished by allowing each firm to emit only 50 percent of its
historical emissions. These allowances are fully tradable. Correctly fill in
the "allowances bought", "allowances sold", and "total
abatement cost, tradable allowances" columns in the table above.