INDEX OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
FOR
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
Professor
Erick Eschker, Director
Andrea Walters,
Assistant Editor
Laura Lampley, Assistant Analyst
This month's
report
is sponsored by
Umpqua Bank
Jump to: Composite | Leading Indicators | Individual Sectors | The Bigger Picture
April 2005

Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted composite Index
is represented in the graph above by the blue area. The red
trendline shows the four-month moving average of the Index
which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show the long run trend.
Composite
Index and Overall Performance
The Index of
Economic Activity for Humboldt County measures changes in the
local
economy using data from local businesses and organizations. The data
are compiled into a seasonally adjusted Index that shows changes
relative to the base month (January 1994). The composite Index is a weighted combination of
six individual sectors of the local
economy. The current Index is
based on the most recently available data, which is generally data from
the previous month.
March saw some growth in the Humboldt County economy, increasing by
just 0.4 percent from February's revised Index value of 109.9.
The
composite Index currently stands at 111.3 (100 = January
1994). A jump in home sales and more moderate expansions in
employment and hospitality were tempered by contractions in retail
sales, energy consumption, and manufacturing. This
indicates some recovery from the sharp dip we saw directly following
January's relatively strong Index report. The
employment sector continued to show growth, increasing 0.7 percent to
an Index value of 107.5. Employment has grown 4.6 percent since
December of 2004. Most of the job growth seen this month is
dependant on the state and local government. The unemployment
rate
for
Humboldt County also fell slightly to 6.3 percent despite an increase
in the labor force. Hospitality saw more marked growth,
increasing 2.7 percent from last month, to a value of 89.7. This
increase is very similar to the growth we saw last month. The hospitality
sector is based on occupancy rates at
local
hotels, motels and inns and represents a
diversity of types of
establishments, both locally owned and nationwide chains. March's
hospitality Index value represents 5.4 percent growth from March of
2004. The
median
home price reached a new all time high this month, barely surpassing
February's record price. The number of homes
sold also increased, shifting home sales up 14.8 percent to an Index
value of 125.3. The home sales sector sees a lot of
month-to-month variability, and often experiences a twenty or thirty
percent change each month in either direction. The manufacturing
sector reported the most significant decline this month, dropping 5.3
percent to an Index value of 87.8. This still represents 2.6
percent growth from last year and 17.5 percent growth from March of
2003. Retail sales
also contracted slightly this month, decreasing 1.6 percent to a value
of
136.7. This contraction could be a reflection of the U.S.
Conference Board's reported decrease in consumer
confidence, or a response to increasing energy costs. Finally,
figures for electricity consumption for the first quarter of 2005
indicate a persistent decline in energy consumption, dropping 5.8
percent in January, 2.0 percent in February, and 2.5 percent in
March. This could be due to increased energy efficiency,
decreased economic activity, or consumers' response to higher energy
costs in general.
|
Composite & Sectoral Performance,
Index
of
Economic Activity for Humboldt County
|
|
* * *
|
Percent Change From:
|
Index
|
Seasonally Adjusted Index Value (1994=100) |
Previous Month |
Same Month 2004 |
Same Month 2003 |
Same Month 2002 |
Same Month 2001
|
Same Month 2000
|
COMPOSITE
|
110.4
|
0.4
|
-1.0
|
6.4
|
4.0
|
1.0
|
-1.6
|
Sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Sales
|
125.3
|
14.8
|
-16.8
|
0.6
|
-2.2
|
10.0
|
3.6
|
|
Retail Sales
|
136.7
|
-1.6
|
-7.0
|
5.9
|
-3.4
|
-3.0
|
1.9
|
|
Hospitality
|
92.1
|
2.7
|
5.4
|
5.3
|
3.4
|
-11.4
|
-6.6
|
|
Electricity Consumption
|
122.4
|
-2.5
|
-0.9
|
3.7
|
14.0
|
10.4
|
-4.7
|
|
Total County Employment
|
107.5
|
0.7
|
3.4
|
6.6
|
4.7
|
3.4
|
3.0
|
|
Manufacturing
|
87.8
|
-5.3
|
2.6
|
17.5
|
10.6
|
-1.6
|
-17.0
|
Jump to: Composite
| Leading
Indicators | Individual
Sectors | The
Bigger Picture
Leading
Indicators
The
Index tracks four leading indicators to get a sense of the direction
of change in
the
county economy in the near future. The four leading indicators
are (1) number of
claims for unemployment insurance, (2) help wanted advertising, (3)
building permits, and (4)
manufacturing orders. The graphs in this section
use a four-month moving average of seasonally adjusted index values in order to
"smooth" ordinary month-to-month volatility and reveal underlying
trends.
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Claims for
Unemployment Insurance is represented above by the blue area. The
red trendline shows a four month moving average which "smoothes" month
to month volatility.
The Index of claims
for unemployment insurance is an indicator of negative economic
activity. This leading indicator increased by 8.9 percent in
March, indicating an increase in unemployment in the future. The
Index of claims for unemployment insurance now stands at 58.0.
This is still a relatively low value, especially when compared to March
of 2004 when the Index stood at 125.2. The
four month moving average indicates that overall unemployment activity
is fairly static.
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Help Wanted
Advertising is represented above by the blue area. The
red trendline shows a four month moving average which "smoothes" month
to month volatility.
The Index of help wanted advertising is an indicator of labor market
conditions and job creation. This Index is based on help wanted
advertisements posted in the Times-Standard.
In March the number of help wanted advertisements increased by 9.0
percent to an Index value of 170.2. The four month moving
average continued to exhibit a steady upward trend with an average
value of 149.9. This indicates continued
job growth in Humboldt County.
Nationally,
the Conference Board's help wanted advertising Index
reported a decline of two percentage points, following February and
January's high. March's Index value of 39 is the same as the
Index value for March of 2004. The Conference Board Economist Ken
Goldstein says: “Clearly something has changed sharply and suddenly.
What appears to have developed is a renewed business caution on
stepping up investing and hiring plans. With cost increasing in 2005
for materials and labor, the key question has been whether executives
can push prices up enough to keep pace with costs. Fears that they may
not be able to accomplish that have turned hiring plans very cautious
again.”
(conference-board.org)
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Building Permits
is represented above by the blue area. The red trendline shows
the four month moving average which "smoothes" month to month
volatility.
The Index of building
permits issued gives insight to future home sales and
construction. In March the Index of building permits continued
last month's decline, dropping 34.6 percent to an Index value of 49.6. Since this
measure experiences a great amount of month to month variability, the
four month moving average is used to determine longer term
trends. As depicted in the graph above, the moving average has
begun to reflect the two months of decline seen in the actual Index
values. The
four month moving average currently stands at 68.4, 18.9 percent higher
than the actual Index value.
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) also reports a leading
indicator of the housing market, The Pending Home Sales Index.
This Index is based on a broad sample of sales-contract activity.
In March the national home sales leading indicator dropped just 0.3
percent. According to NAR's chief economist, even though activity
looks to be slowing, expectations are still high when compared to the
same period last year, and any contractions this month serve to balance
the strong activity we've seen recently. (realtor.org)
Graphic description: The seasonally
adjusted Index of Manufacturing Orders
is represented above by the blue area. The red trendline shows
the four month moving average which "smoothes" month to month
volatility.
The Index of
manufacturing orders shows expectations for future manufacturing
sales. This Index jumped 28.5 percent in March to an Index
value of 75.3. This increase is as a reversal of the last two month's
decline, and serves to level the fourth month moving average. The
average of the last four months of manufacturing orders now stands at
80.1, and is down slightly from last month.
Nationally, the U.S. Census Bureau reports a 2.8 percent decrease in
manufacturing orders for durable goods and a 0.2 percent increase in
new orders for general manufactured goods. (census.gov)
|
Key Statistics
|
Leading Indicators
|
|
|
% Change From Previous Month
|
| Median
Home Price* |
$295,217
|
Unemployment
Claims |
8.9
|
30
Yr.
Mortgage Rate as of 1/15
|
5.875%
|
Help Wanted
|
9.0
|
| Unemployment
Rate** |
6.3%
|
Building
Permit |
-34.6
|
|
|
Manufacturing
Orders
|
28.5
|
| * Home price data are provided by the Humboldt
Association of Realtors. MLS is not responsible for accuracy of
information. The information published and disseminated by the
Service is communicated verbatim, without change by the Service,
as filed with the Service by the Participant. The Service does not
verify such information provided and disclaims any responsibility
for its accuracy. Each Participant agrees to hold the Service
harmless against any liability arising from any inaccuracy or
inadequacy
of the information. |
| ** Preliminary EDD data (not seasonally
adjusted). See the EDD
Website for updates. |
Individual
Sectors
Home Sales
The index
value of the home sales sector is based on the number of new and
existing homes
sold in Humboldt County each month as recorded by the Humboldt
Association of Realtors.
Home sales in Humboldt County increased in March, following a decrease
in the number of homes sold last month. The Index grew 14.8
percent to an Index value of 125.3. The median selling price for
a home in Humboldt County was $295,217 this month, an increase from
February's median selling price of $295,000. March's figure is
now the highest recorded price since the Index began in 1994.
The median selling price does not affect the Index.
Statewide
home prices are also on the rise, increasing 5.2
percent in March to $495,400. This represents a 15.7 percent
increase in the median home price for the same period last year.
The state sales
index increased 7.5 percent when compared
to March of 2004. This indicates another strong year for the
California housing market, in part dependant on California growing as a
state. “Year-to-date sales are 6 percent ahead of last year’s
pace, reflecting the continued strength of the real estate market and
the improving economic fundamentals of the California economy,” said
C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young.
“Demographic growth in the state’s population also is fueling much of
this activity -- California has absorbed three million new residents
since 2000.”
(car.org)
Nationwide
home sales were strong as well. The seasonally adjusted number of
homes sold rose 1.0 percent in March to 6.89 million, while sales
increased 4.9 percent compared with last year at this time. The
national median home
price rose 11.4 percent from March of 2004 to $195,000. David
Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said economic improvements have been
supporting the housing sector. “With mortgage interest rates remaining
historically low, gains in the labor market and economic growth appear
to have lifted the confidence of home buyers,” he said. “There’s no
question there is a strong demand for housing from a growing
population.” (realtor.org)
According
to the country's largest mortgage company, Freddie Mac, the nationwide
average for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage as of April 28th was 5.78
percent with an average 0.6 points. This is down from last
month's mortgage rate of 6.04
percent. In April of 2004 the 30-year fixed rate mortgage
averaged 6.01 percent. “The market was disappointed on the news
of lower consumer confidence and lower orders for durable goods," said
Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist. "These numbers
suggest that the Fed will remain restrained in its practice of raising
short term rates, which may be an indication the Fed doesn't see
inflation to be as great a threat as the markets previously had thought
it would be.”
(freddiemac.com)
Enthusiasm
for growth in the home sales sector is often tempered with concerns
about housing affordability. This is clearly and issue in
Humboldt County, as we at the Index have recorded several record
setting median home prices, in both real and nominal terms.
According to a study conducted by the Center for Housing Policy and
funded by Freddie Mac, the number of working families in the United
States who spend more than half of their income on housing has grown
from 2.4 million in 1997 to 4.2 million in 2003. This is a 76
percent increase in less than a decade. The study
classifies 14.1 million American families as having 'critical housing
needs' in 2003. The study also found that the majority of working
families with critical housing needs are immigrant families.
"These new findings help shed light on a troubling trend across America
– working a full-time job does not guarantee families a decent,
affordable place to live," said Barbara Lipman, research director for
the Center for Housing Policy. "In fact, the housing problems of
working families are more persistent and pervasive than many experts
may have thought, and are not only confined to cities, renters, or the
East and West coasts." (freddiemac.com)
Visit Freddie Mac for more information,
or click
here for the full report.
Retail Sales
The
Index value for the retail sales sector is based on the seasonally
adjusted dollar value of
sales each month from a cross section of local retail businesses.
The retail sales sector declined this month to a value of 136.7.
This is a 1.6 percent decline from February, and a 7.0 percent decline
from March of 2004. Retail sales, usually strong in Humboldt
County, failed to meet seasonal expectations this month. This
contraction should not affect the overall upward trend of the retail
sales Index, as indicated by a high four-month moving average of
143.0.
National retail sales, as reported by
U.S. Census Bureau, increased slightly in March.
Seasonally adjusted
sales were $339.3 billion, an increase of 0.3 percent (±0.7%)
from the previous month and up 5.8 percent (±0.8%) from March
2004. Total sales from January through March 2005 were up 7.2
percent (±0.7%) from the same period a year ago. (census.gov)
The
Federal Reserve Board reported continued economic expansion across the
nation over the last few months, including "solid growth" in San
Francisco. Most notably, while the sales of domestic and larger
cars and trucks stagnated, apparel
and jewelry sales were reported as strong in many regions of the
U.S. Any sluggish retail activity is attributed to unfavorable
weather and rising gasoline prices. Gas prices specifically
seemed to influence a decline in the demand for SUVs in many districts,
although there was not noticeable shift to smaller vehicles.
(federalreserve.gov)
According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, Texan
dealerships specifically have noticed consumers shifting away from SUVs
like the Honda CRV and GMC's Chevrolet Suburban and Tahoe and toward
more fuel efficient vehicles like Chevrolet's Aveo. Because Texas
has long been the stronghold for big trucks and bigger SUVs, this shift
has raised concerns for many automobile manufacturers. One result
is development and subsequent increased sales of more "crossover" SUVs,
which are smaller and more fuel efficient because they are built on a
car underpinning rather than a heavier and bulkier truck frame.
The other result is the decline of the SUV as we know it today.
Both General Motors corp. and Ford have cut SUV production
plants. According to William Clay Ford Jr., the chairman and
chief executive officer of Ford, "The shift out of traditional SUVs
which we anticipated several years ago is happening at a rate faster
than we anticipated". (wsj.com)
Looking to the future, the Conference
Board's Consumer Confidence Index declined again in April. This
is the fourth consecutive month of decline in consumer confidence.
“Less robust current conditions and a more cautious outlook have
consumers feeling less confident in April than in March,” says Lynn
Franco, Director of The Conference Board’s Consumer Research Center.
“Looking ahead, consumers do not anticipate an improvement in economic
growth nor in their incomes. And, they expect an even tighter job
market over the summer months.” The
Consumer Confidence Index now
stands at 97.7 (1985=100), down from 103.0 in March and 104.4 in
February.
(conference-board.org)
Hospitality
The Index
value of the hospitality sector is based on
seasonally adjusted average occupancy each month at a cross section of
local hotels, motels
and inns.
Graphic
description: The seasonally adjusted hospitality index is represented
by the blue area in the graph above.
The red line shows the twelve-month moving average of the hospitality
index which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show
the long run trend.
The
hospitality sector continued to grow in March, increasing 2.7
percent from February's value to 92.1. This is the third
consecutive month the hospitality sector has seen growth. This
most recent figure is
also up 5.4 percent from the Index value form the same time last year,
and up 5.3 percent from March of 2003. Please note that the
index numbers are seasonally
adjusted and relate back to the base month January 1994.
This seasonally adjusted index is different from raw occupancy
rates, as the expected seasonal variation is removed so that changes
over time can be compared more appropriately. The twelve-month
moving average, indicated by the red trend line, shows that
while the hospitality sector fluctuates from month to month beyond
seasonal
variability, the overall trend is one of consistency. In the last
four years the twelve-month moving average has not dropped below 90.0
or reached above 100.0 in four years.
Nationally,
The Federal Reserve Board indicated strong tourism spending reported by
several
financial districts including San Francisco. The Federal Reserve
indicated that tourism spending was strongly linked to favorable
weather.
(federalreserve.gov)
Gasoline
Prices
Gas prices continue their sharp increase
in April, in Humboldt County and across the nation. According to
the California
State Automotive Association, Eureka has the highest average gas price
in the state at $2.82 for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline.
While the crude oil price has fallen in recent weeks, consumers have
yet to see much affect. This is especially worrisome as we head
into the summer, which is traditionally a season of increased gas
consumption and lower prices. Eureka's gas prices are 19
cents higher than the state average, and 55 cents higher than the
national average. According to AAA, the least expensive gasoline
is found in Monmouth, New Jersey where the average price is $2.05 per
gallon.
"Prices in many communities have increased by 70 cents a gallon or more
since the beginning of the year," said Sean Comey, spokesman for AAA of
Northern California. "The rate of increase has jumped recently, from a
penny or so a day to a nickel or more overnight in some cases."
(csaa.com)
Because of record high prices, this
month's Bigger Picture section includes more information on the forces
driving gasoline prices. For a local perspective, visit our Special
Projects page for Dr. Eschker's Study of the Eureka Gasoline Market
and an examination of why Humboldt County gas prices tend to be higher
than the rest of California's.
Average Price*
(as of 4/12)
|
Change From Prev. Month
(cents/gal.)
|
| Eureka |
$2.82
|
40¢
|
| Northern Ca |
$2.62
|
34¢
|
| California |
$2.63
|
35¢
|
Current average price per gallon
of self-serve regular un-
leaded gasoline as reported by the American Automobile
Association's monthly gas survey (www.csaa.com). |
Electricity
Consumption
The Index value
of this sector is based on seasonally adjusted kilowatts-hours of
electricity consumed each
month in Humboldt County. Electricity consumption is a
somewhat mixed or ambiguous indicator that usually correlates with
economic activity. However, increases in energy efficiency
and conservation reduce the sector's index value. Because we
collect our data for this sector quarterly, values are estimated, and
are revised when the quarterly data are received.
The actual value of the electricity Index fell 2.5 percent to 122.4 in
March.
First quarter electricity consumption figures have been revised:
* January's electricity Index which was originally
reported at 137.3, was revised down to 128.1.
* February's electricity Index which was originally
reported at 113.5, was revised up to 125.5.
Total
County
Employment
The Index value of the employment sector
is based on seasonally adjusted total employment as reported by the
Employment Development Department.
In March's preliminary employment and
labor force report, the
EDD reported 57,900 people employed in Humboldt
County. This is a net gain of 600 job from February's revised
number.
The total civilian
labor force increased by 100 people to 61,700. The seasonally
adjusted
total
county employment Index rose by just 0.7 percent, and now stands
at 107.5. This is a 3.4 percent increase from the same period
last year.
Sectoral
changes in Humboldt County employment:
- Overall the service sector posted a net
gain of 700 jobs in March.
- Wholesale Trade gained
100 jobs.
- Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing Services
gained 100 jobs.
- Education and Health Services gained 100
jobs.
- Food Services and Drinking Places gained
100 jobs.
- Local Government gained 100 jobs.
- State Government gained 200 jobs.
- Overall goods producing employment gained
300 jobs in March.
- Wood Product Manufacturing gained 200
jobs.
- Construction gained 100 jobs.
The revised county
unemployment rate dropped from 7.1 percent in February to 6.3 percent
this month.
Both the State and National remain below the county level at 5.7
percent and 5.4 percent respectively. The decrease in the
unemployment rate is pushed by a relatively large increase in jobs and
a rather small
increase in the total local labor force.
Lumber
Manufacturing
The
index value
of this sector is based on a
combination of payroll employment and board feet of lumber production
at
major county lumber companies and is adjusted to account for normal
seasonal variations. Lumber-based manufacturing
generates about 60 percent of total county manufacturing employment.

Graphic
description: The seasonally adjusted lumber-based
manufacturing index is represented by the blue area in the graph above.
The red line shows the four-month moving average of the lumber-based
manufacturing index which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show
the long run trend.
In
March lumber based manufacturing declined further to an Index value of
87.8. This represents a 5.3 percent contraction from February's
figure and a 16.3 percent contraction from January's figure. The
four month moving average has leveled out to 97.3. This month's
value represents a 2.6 percent increase
from March of 2004.
National economic activity in the
manufacturing
sector, as measured by the Institute of
Supply
Management, registered 53.3 percent on May 2nd. A number over 50
indicates growth. This is the 23rd consecutive month of growth,
although manufacturing growth has slowed consistently over the past
four months. "February was another good month in the
manufacturing sector. While the overall rate of growth is slowing, the
overall picture is improving as price increases and shortages are
becoming less of a problem. Exports and imports remain strong. The
recent trend of inventory growth reversed direction during February;
this reduces possible concerns about involuntary inventory build.
Customers' inventories declined slightly, reinforcing the probability
that inventories are not yet a concern." said Norbert J. Ore, C.P.M., chair of the
Institute for Supply Management. (ism.ws.cfm)
According to a recent article in the San
Francisco Chronicle, the slowed pace of national manufacturing is
generally good news; many economists concerned with inflation feel this
slowing could indicate a cooling of the economy necessary to balance
out inflationary pressure. Douglas Porter, deputy
chief economist at BMO Nesbitt Burns, said "you could make the case
that manufacturing activity had been running too hot for comfort for
the past year or so. We would have had serious inflationary
pressure had the manufacturing sector kept growing at that pace," he
added. Now, he said, the U.S. economy appears to be on track to expand
at a sustainable rate. (sfgate.com)
Jump to: Composite
| Leading
Indicators | Individual
Sectors | The
Bigger Picture
The
Bigger Picture
Spotlight on Gas Prices
By: Andrea Walters
Although the price of a barrel of oil has dropped in recent weeks, many
consumers in California and Humboldt County have yet to see much
change. The average price of a barrel of oil peaked the first
week in April at $52.07, and currently stands at $49.60. This
price is based on the value of a ‘basket’ of seven crude oils, set by
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and received
in New York. (djnewswire.com) Oil prices have risen sharply
in recent years, from an annual average of $23.12 in 2001, to an
average of $45.38 for the first four months of 2005. In fact, the
exceptionally high oil prices world wide have led OPEC to retract many
of its price controls, such as a minimum price band of $22 to $28 per
barrel of crude oil. High prices and increasing demand have also
induced OPEC to increase production, raising the upward limit on oil
production for its members by 500,000 barrels a day in March.
OPEC has considered another increase in production, but is hesitant to
risk flooding the market.
California consistently responds more quickly and more severely to
increases in the price of crude oil per barrel. Many speculate as
to the reasons why California is so responsive, and conventional wisdom
leans toward blaming refineries and gas distributors for ‘gouging’
Californians. In a recent report for the California Energy
Commission and prepared by the University of California Energy
Institute many of these conventional wisdom arguments are
dismissed. According to the report, Market
Power in California’s Gasoline Market, the primary factor
influencing California’s high gas prices is its legislated use of
California Reformulated Gasoline (CaRFG). CaRFG is a type of
gasoline used specifically in California, and is “cleaner-burning” than
the gasoline used in other states.
Because California requires a special blend of gasoline, it has to get
its gas from refineries that specifically produce CaRFG. Only
thirteen of the twenty-two refineries in California are equipped to
produce CaRFG. In 2003 the CaRFG supplied by those thirteen
refineries totaled about 15 billion gallons while 14.8 billion gallons
of CaRFG were consumed. Today the refineries that produce CaRFG
are producing at or near their maximum, meaning that even though the
demand for and price of CaRFG is increasing, the supply stays
essentially the same. This lack of response to changes in price
and in demand is referred to as inelasticity. Inelasticity on the
supply side of CaRFG means that when the price of crude oil goes up,
suppliers have no choice but to pass the additional cost on to
consumers. This supply-side inelasticity also means that an
increase in demand will be met with higher prices, not higher supply.
Inelasticity of supply is one half of force behind California’s
responsiveness to increases in international oil prices. The
other half is based on the behavior of Californian consumers.
Californians are widely recognized for their love affair with the
automobile. This is evidenced daily on freeways (the frequency of
cars with a single passenger) and in driveways (the number of
households with multiple cars) across the state. It takes a
substantial increase in the price of gasoline to induce Americans in
general and Californians in specific to drive less and subsequently
demand less gasoline. This lack of response to changes in price
is known as inelasticity of demand, which works with inelasticity of
supply to continually force gas prices in California higher than in
other states. It’s very
possible we are seeing the same thing today; an increase in
the price of crude oil has raised the price of gasoline everywhere, but
especially in California where inelasticity on both the supply and the
demand side mean higher retail prices.
This is of special concern to Humboldt County consumers, who feel price
increases more sharply. According to the California State
Automotive Association, Eureka is once again home to the highest gas
prices in California with $2.82. Eureka, and subsequently
Humboldt County, tends to experience higher than average gas prices for
several reasons, as explained in Dr. Eschker and Humboldt State
University economics student Lara Remke’s paper Regulation
and Competition in Rural Gasoline Markets. The last time that
Eureka gasoline prices were considerably
above San Francisco, in 2002, the main reasons were the switch to
Ethanol and
increased competition in San
Francisco.
Integrated
retailers, retail gas stations owned and operated by
refineries, lowered prices in San Francisco in an effort to increase
their share of the retail market. In 2003 gas prices in Eureka
declined relative to San Francisco in anticipation of increased
competition from Costco.
Regional fluctuations in gas prices are generally tied to changes in
the level of competition. While the forces behind Eureka's recent
price increase are still unclear, the fact that prices will continue to
increase remains. The price of crude oil has dropped in recent
weeks, it is on the
rise again, and can be expected to continue to rise in the
future. The fact of the matter is that oil is a non-renewable
resource, and very expensive. According to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration we imported over 10 million barrels of oil
per day for three consecutive weeks in April. Demand for oil is
constantly increasing in the United States, while domestic production
remains relatively flat. Every year the amount of oil we import
increases, and as the price of that oil increases, we may, as a nation,
have an incentive to find an alternative. (eia.doe.gov)
| Explanatory Note: For those of you who are new
or less familiar with the Index, we have been tracking
economic activity since January 1994. The composite indices
plotted as blue and red lines in the diagram at the top of this
page are weighted averages of each of the six sectors described in
the table above. Each sectoral index, and the composite index, started
at a value of 100 in 1994. Thus if the retail sectoral index value is
currently 150, that means that (inflation-adjusted) retail sales among
the firms that report data to us are 50 percent higher than in
January 1994. We also seasonally adjust each sector, and the
composite index, to correct for "normal" seasonal variation in the
data,
such as wet season vs. dry season, and so trends in the
seasonally-adjusted composite index provide a better indication of
underlying growth and fundamental change
in the economy. Each month's report reflects data
gathered from the
previous month. For example, the "August 2003" report reflects
data from July
2003. As is common, our initial report is
preliminary, and as we
receive final data we revise our reports accordingly. |
Cited References
American Automobile Association
California Association of Realtors
The Conference Board
Dow Jones Newswires
Energy Information Administration
The
Federal Reserve Board's Beige Book
Freddie Mac
Institute of Supply Management
National Association of Realtors
The San Francisco Chronicle
The Wall Street Journal
University of California
Energy Institute
U.S. Bureau of the Census's home
page
U.S.
Bureau of the Census's Economic Briefing Room
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic
Send us
your comments. Comments will be posted on our Reader
Comments page unless otherwise requested.