INDEX OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
FOR
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
Professor
Erick Eschker, Director
Andrea Walters,
Assistant Editor
Laura Lampley, Assistant Analyst
This month's
report
is sponsored by
Coast Central Credit Union
Jump to: Composite | Leading Indicators | Individual Sectors
May 2005

Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted composite Index
is represented in the graph above by the blue area. The red
trendline shows the four-month moving average of the Index
which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show the long run trend.
Composite
Index and Overall Performance
The Index of
Economic Activity for Humboldt County measures changes in the
local
economy using data from local businesses and organizations. The data
are compiled into a seasonally adjusted Index that shows changes
relative to the base month (January 1994). The composite Index is a weighted combination of
six individual sectors of the local
economy. The current Index is
based on the most recently available data, which is generally data from
the previous month.
Humboldt County's economy contracted slightly in April, pulled
primarily by lost momentum in the hospitality and manufacturing
sectors. The composite Index currently stands at 109.3 (100 =
January
1994). This represents a 0.8 percent decline from March and
a 1.6 percent decline from April of 2004. This dip continues the
downward trend we saw in January to a lesser degree; contractions in
hospitality and manufacturing were tempered by substantial growth in
home sales and slight growth in retail sales. The
employment sector posted no change this month, holding at an Index
value of 107.1, 4.0 percent higher than the same period last
year. The unemployment
rate
for
Humboldt County decreased 5.8 percent. Hospitality decreased 6.9
percent to a seasonally adjusted Index value of 85.7 percent, following
three months of growth. The hospitality
sector is based on occupancy rates at
local
hotels, motels and inns and represents a
diversity of types of
establishments, both locally owned and nationwide chains. Manufacturing also
lost momentum, dropping 5.4 percent to an Index value of 83.1.
This is the fourth consecutive month of decline in the manufacturing
sector. The retail sales sector posted marginal growth,
increasing only 0.8 percent in April. The Index of retail sales
performance now stands at 137.7. Home sales saw the most
substantial increase of any sector, growing 4.7 percent to a seasonally
adjusted Index value of 131.2. The home sales sector sees a lot
of
month-to-month variability, and often experiences a twenty or thirty
percent change each month in either direction. Finally,
figures for electricity consumption for the month of April were
estimated at 122.1.
|
Composite & Sectoral Performance,
Index
of
Economic Activity for Humboldt County
|
|
* * *
|
Percent Change From:
|
Index
|
Seasonally Adjusted Index Value (1994=100) |
Previous Month |
Same Month 2004 |
Same Month 2003 |
Same Month 2002 |
Same Month 2001
|
Same Month 2000
|
COMPOSITE
|
109.3
|
-0.8
|
-1.6
|
1.4
|
2.9
|
1.7
|
-2.7
|
Sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Sales
|
131.2
|
4.7
|
-1.9
|
-13.5
|
-1.0
|
13.3
|
19.5
|
|
Retail Sales
|
137.7
|
0.8
|
-2.0
|
10.0
|
2.8
|
10.9
|
2.0
|
|
Hospitality
|
85.7
|
-6.9
|
-20.0
|
-7.5
|
-8.5
|
-15.8
|
-13.9
|
|
Electricity Consumption
|
122.1
|
0.0
|
3.3
|
1.8
|
17.5
|
-0.9
|
-7.5
|
|
Total County Employment
|
107.1
|
0.0
|
4.0
|
3.4
|
4.6
|
4.0
|
2.2
|
|
Manufacturing
|
83.1
|
-5.4 |
-3.2
|
3.3
|
-3.6
|
-4.7
|
-21.3
|
Jump to: Composite
| Leading
Indicators | Individual
Sectors
Leading
Indicators
The
Index tracks four leading indicators to get a sense of the direction
of change in
the
county economy in the near future. The four leading indicators
are (1) number of
claims for unemployment insurance, (2) help wanted advertising, (3)
building permits, and (4)
manufacturing orders. The graphs in this section
use a four-month moving average of seasonally adjusted index values in order to
"smooth" ordinary month-to-month volatility and reveal underlying
trends.
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Claims for
Unemployment Insurance is represented above by the blue area. The
red trendline shows a four month moving average which "smoothes" month
to month volatility.
The Index of claims
for unemployment insurance is an indicator of negative economic
activity. This leading indicator increased by 21.4 percent in
April. This suggests a strong increase in unemployment in the
future. The
Index of claims for unemployment insurance now stands at 70.4.
This is only slightly higher than the unemployment insurance leading
indicator value of 70.2 for April of 2004. The
four month moving average indicates that overall unemployment activity
is fairly static.
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Help Wanted
Advertising is represented above by the blue area. The
red trendline shows a four month moving average which "smoothes" month
to month volatility.
The Index of help wanted advertising is an indicator of labor market
conditions and job creation. This Index is based on help wanted
advertisements posted in the Times-Standard.
In March the number of help wanted advertisements decreased by 15.9
percent to an Index value of 143.1. Despite this drop, the four
month moving
average continued to exhibit a steady upward trend with an average
value of 151.9. This could indicate a softening of the
labor market in Humboldt County.
Nationally,
the Conference Board's help wanted advertising Index
reported no change from last month, following three months of gradual
decline. April's Index value of 39 represents an increase from
April of 2004, when the conference board reported a help wanted
advertising Index value of 38. Says Conference Board Economist
Ken Goldstein: “The labor market indicators were soft in April. Want-ad
volume was flat while the data on initial unemployment claims was
essentially unchanged. These are indications that hiring intentions
again turned cautious in April. Other economy-wide data were
pointing to the possibility of the economy falling into a soft-patch
this summer, for the second year in a row. If that were to develop, it
would be enough under ordinary conditions to make businesses cautious
with respect to adding expensive labor over the next few months.”
(conference-board.org)
Graphic description: The seasonally adjusted Index of Building Permits
is represented above by the blue area. The red trendline shows
the four month moving average which "smoothes" month to month
volatility.
The Index of building
permits issued gives insight to future home sales and
construction. In April the Index of building permits continued to
drop, declining 19.6 percent to an Index value of 39.8. Since this
measure experiences a great amount of month to month variability, the
four month moving average is used to determine longer term
trends. As depicted in the graph above, the moving average has
begun to reflect the three months of decline seen in actual Index
values. The
four month moving average currently stands at 61.0.
Graphic description: The seasonally
adjusted Index of Manufacturing Orders
is represented above by the blue area. The red trendline shows
the four month moving average which "smoothes" month to month
volatility.
The Index of
manufacturing orders shows expectations for future manufacturing
sales. This leading indicator contracted slightly, following a
surge in March. The April value stands at 66.2, a 12.1 percent
decrease from last month's value. Because manufacturing orders
are
subject to dramatic shifts, the four month moving average helps to
illustrate the larger trend. The
average of the last four months of manufacturing orders now stands at
69.6, down from last month.
Nationally, the U.S. Census Bureau reports a 1.9 percent increase in
manufacturing orders for durable goods and a 0.9 percent increase in
new orders for general manufactured goods. (census.gov)
|
Key Statistics
|
Leading Indicators
|
|
|
% Change From Previous Month
|
| Median
Home Price* |
$295,000
|
Unemployment
Claims |
21.4
|
30
Yr.
Mortgage Rate as of 5/25
|
5.750%
|
Help Wanted
|
-15.9
|
| Unemployment
Rate** |
5.8%
|
Building
Permit |
-19.6
|
|
|
Manufacturing
Orders
|
-12.1
|
| * Home price data are provided by the Humboldt
Association of Realtors. MLS is not responsible for accuracy of
information. The information published and disseminated by the
Service is communicated verbatim, without change by the Service,
as filed with the Service by the Participant. The Service does not
verify such information provided and disclaims any responsibility
for its accuracy. Each Participant agrees to hold the Service
harmless against any liability arising from any inaccuracy or
inadequacy
of the information. |
| ** Preliminary EDD data (not seasonally
adjusted). See the EDD
Website for updates. |
Individual
Sectors
Home Sales
The Index
value of the home sales sector is based on the number of new and
existing homes
sold in Humboldt County each month as recorded by the Humboldt
Association of Realtors.
Home sales in Humboldt County continued to increase in April, growing
to a seasonally adjusted Index value of 131.2. This represents a
4.7 percent increase from March's value, and a 1.9 percent decrease
from April of 2004. The home sales Index value was pushed up this
month the number of homes sold increasing beyond seasonal
expectations. The median selling price for
a home in Humboldt County remained high at $295,000. The median
selling price does not affect the Index.
Statewide
home prices are also on the rise, increasing beyond
$500,000 for the first time. The median price of a home sold in
California reached $509,230 in April. This represents a 12.5
percent
increase in the median home price for the same period last year and a
2.6 percent increase over March's revised median selling price.
The state sales
index increased 2.7 percent when compared
to April of 2004. This indicates another strong year for the
California housing market, in part dependant on California growing as a
state. “Year-to-date sales are up 5.1 percent compared to a year
ago” said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie
Appleton-Young. “Although interest rates remain near their historical
lows, consumers are clearly concerned about the impact rising rates
will have on their ability to purchase a home.”
(car.org)
Existing
home sales, a measure of the housing market produced by the National
Association of Realtors (NAR), also reached a record high in
April. The seasonally adjusted number of single family homes sold
increased to 6.28 million this month. This represents a 4.5
percent increase from March and a 5.0 percent increase from April of
2004. David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said sales had been
expected to hold at high levels. “A new record is a bit unexpected, but
so is the performance of mortgage interest rates which have been lower
than forecast,” he said. “When we look at recent job gains, we see all
the positive factors coming together to coincide with a powerful
demographic demand for housing.” The national median selling
price of a home reached $206,000 in April, 15.1 percent higher than the
same period last year. (realtor.org)
According
to the country's largest mortgage company, Freddie Mac, the nationwide
average for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage as of June 2nd was 5.62
percent with an average 0.6 points. This is down from last
month's mortgage rate of 5.78
percent. Low mortgage rates and brisk home sales led to an
annualized 9.6 percent rate of house price appreciation in the first
quarter," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief
economist, "As strong as home sales and new home construction were last
year, this year is off to an even stronger start," said Nothaft. "Sales
of new and existing houses and pre-owned condominiums averaged an
annualized total of 8.1 million units sold in the first quarter.
National annual home price growth is likely to slow in 2005. Our best
estimate is that house price growth will moderate to between six
percent and nine percent as interest rates climb higher. We are already
seeing some slowing in the quarterly growth rates relative to autumn of
last year when home prices were growing at nearly double the current
rate."
(freddiemac.com)
Retail Sales
The
Index value for the retail sales sector is based on the seasonally
adjusted dollar value of
sales each month from a cross section of local retail businesses.
The retail sales sector grew this month to a value of 137.7.
This is a 0.8 percent increase from March, and a 2.0 percent decline
from April of 2004. Retail sales is consistently one of the
strongest economic sectors of the Index. This month's relatively
small increase does not correct last month's dip in retail sales, as
indicated by a slight decline in the four-month moving average. The
four-month moving average now stands at 140.6.
National retail sales, as reported by
U.S. Census Bureau, increased slightly in April.
Seasonally adjusted
sales were $344.9 billion, an increase of 1.4 percent (±0.7%)
from the previous month and up 8.6 percent (±0.8%) from April
2004. Total sales for the February through April 2005 period were up
7.5 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago.
(census.gov)
The
Federal Reserve Board reported relatively flat retail sales in most of
its districts. Federal Reserve districts that saw an increase in
retail sales included Boston, Kansas City, and San Francisco. The
San Francisco district specifically reported "robust" automobile sales.
(federalreserve.gov)
Nationally, many retailers counted on increased spending from
teenagers to boost sluggish sales. According to a Wall Street Journal article teen shoppers are "going
wild". Retail clothing stores catering specifically to younger
consumers consistently faired better this month than their more mature
counterparts. Companies like Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and
American Eagle Outfitters Inc. posted double-digit sales increases in
May while Gap Inc. saw sales decrease. (wsj.com)
Looking to the future, the Conference
Board's Consumer Confidence Index increased, following three months of
decline. The Index, which is a national measure of consumer
expectations, now stands at 102.2 (1985=100). “Consumer
confidence improved in May, gaining back nearly all of the ground it
lost in April,” says Lynn Franco, Director of The Conference Board’s
Consumer Research Center. The Conference Board's other indicators
of future economic conditions also reported higher expectations,
including a decrease in consumer concerns about the economy and jobs.
(conference-board.org)
Hospitality
The Index
value of the hospitality sector is based on
seasonally adjusted average occupancy each month at a cross section of
local hotels, motels
and inns.
Graphic
description: The seasonally adjusted hospitality index is represented
by the blue area in the graph above.
The red line shows the twelve-month moving average of the hospitality
index which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show
the long run trend.
The
hospitality sector shrank in April, decreasing 6.9
percent from March to an Index value of 85.7. This is a 20.0
percent decrease from April of 2004 and a 7.5 percent decrease from
April of 2003. This seems to imply that occupancy rates this
month did not meet seasonal expectations. Please note that the
index numbers are seasonally
adjusted and relate back to the base month January 1994.
This seasonally adjusted index is different from raw occupancy
rates, as the expected seasonal variation is removed so that changes
over time can be compared more appropriately. The twelve-month
moving average, indicated by the red trend line, shows that
while the hospitality sector fluctuates from month to month beyond
seasonal
variability, the overall trend is one of consistency. The
twelve-month moving average has not dropped below 90.0
or reached above 100.0 in four years.
Nationally,
The Federal Reserve Board indicated an increase in tourism spending
reported by
several
financial districts. San Francisco specifically noted an increase
in hotel occupancy and "strong forward bookings for summer tourist
destinations".
(federalreserve.gov)
Gasoline
Prices
Consumers finally found relief in May as
prices across the nation decreased an average 2.8 cents per gallon of
regular gasoline. State-wide, California saw gas prices decrease 10 cents, while Eureka enjoyed a 17 cent
decline. The drop in the retail price of gasoline is
attributed to a sharp drop in the price of crude oil. According
to
the California
State Automotive Association, San Francisco has the highest average gas
price
in the state at $2.68 for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline, while
Eureka's average gas price shrank to $2.65. The least expensive gasoline
is found in Springfield, Missouri where the average price is $1.92 per
gallon. "It’s not a big decline, but at
least prices are moving downward," said Sean Comey, spokesman for AAA
of Northern California. "To put it in perspective, even if this trend
continues-and that’s a really big ‘if’- it would be another three
months at this rate before we’d see prices fall below two dollars a
gallon again."
(csaa.com)
Looking to the future, gas prices may increase through the summer as
demand for and consumption of gasoline increase, driving the price at
the pump up.
For a local perspective, visit our Special
Projects page for Dr. Eschker's Study of the Eureka Gasoline Market
and an examination of why Humboldt County gas prices tend to be higher
than the rest of California's.
Average Price*
(as of 5/17)
|
Change From Prev. Month
(cents/gal.)
|
| Eureka |
$2.65
|
-17¢
|
| Northern Ca |
$2.55
|
-7¢
|
| California |
$2.53
|
-10¢
|
Current average price per gallon
of self-serve regular un-
leaded gasoline as reported by the American Automobile
Association's monthly gas survey (www.csaa.com). |
Electricity
Consumption
The Index value
of this sector is based on seasonally adjusted kilowatts-hours of
electricity consumed each
month in Humboldt County. Electricity consumption is a
somewhat mixed or ambiguous indicator that usually correlates with
economic activity. However, increases in energy efficiency
and conservation reduce the sector's index value. Because we
collect our data for this sector quarterly, values are estimated, and
are revised when the quarterly data are received.
The estimated value of the electricity Index is 122.0 in April,
unchanged from last month.
Total
County
Employment
The Index value of the employment sector
is based on seasonally adjusted total employment as reported by the
Employment Development Department.
In April's preliminary employment and
labor force report, the
EDD reported 57,900 people employed in Humboldt
County. This is a net gain of 200 jobs from March's revised
number.
The total civilian
labor force decreased by 200 people to 61,500. After adjusting for
seasonal variation, the employment sector's Index value remains
unchanged from last month at 107.1. This is a 4.0 percent
increase from the same period
last year.
Sectoral
changes in Humboldt County employment:
- Overall the service sector posted a net
gain of 400 jobs in April.
- Retail Trade gained
100 jobs.
- Real Estate, Rental, and Leasing Services
lost 100 jobs.
- Professional and Business Services gained
100
jobs.
- Transportation, Warehousing, and
Utilities gained 100 jobs.
- Leisure and Hospitality gained
100 jobs.
- Local Government gained 100 jobs.
- Net employment in the manufacturing
sector was unchanged in April.
The revised county
unemployment rate continued its decline, dropping from 6.3 percent in
March to 5.8 percent
this month.
Both the State and National remain below the county level at 5.2
percent and 4.9 percent respectively.
Lumber
Manufacturing
The
index value
of this sector is based on a
combination of payroll employment and board feet of lumber production
at
major county lumber companies and is adjusted to account for normal
seasonal variations. Lumber-based manufacturing
generates about 60 percent of total county manufacturing employment.

Graphic
description: The seasonally adjusted lumber-based
manufacturing index is represented by the blue area in the graph above.
The red line shows the four-month moving average of the lumber-based
manufacturing index which smoothes month-to-month volatility to show
the long run trend.
In
April lumber based manufacturing continued its decline, dropping 5.4
percent to a seasonally adjusted Index value of 83.1. This
represents a 3.2 percent contraction from April of 2004's
figure and a 20.5 percent contraction total since the manufacturing
sector's spike in December. The
four month moving average has also dropped to 91.9.
National economic activity in the
manufacturing
sector, as measured by the Institute of
Supply
Management, registered 51.4 percent on June 1st. A number over 50
indicates growth. This is the 24th consecutive month of growth,
although this month's figures are a continuation of the slowing trend
that began five months ago. "While this represents the longest
period of growth in the last 16 years, the data also indicates that the
sector is losing momentum, as this month's PMI is at the lowest level
since June 2003 when it registered 50.4 percent. The rate of growth in
New Orders continues to decline, and this month only 11 of 20
industries are reporting improvement when comparing May to April. The
Employment Index failed to grow, ending 18 months of employment growth.
The manufacturing sector is definitely slowing, and the question is
whether a somewhat stronger dollar and the burden of high energy costs
are slowly bringing this manufacturing growth cycle to end." said Norbert J. Ore, C.P.M., chair of the
Institute for Supply Management. (ism.ws.cfm)
Jump to: Composite
| Leading
Indicators | Individual
Sectors
| Explanatory Note: For those of you who are new
or less familiar with the Index, we have been tracking
economic activity since January 1994. The composite indices
plotted as blue and red lines in the diagram at the top of this
page are weighted averages of each of the six sectors described in
the table above. Each sectoral index, and the composite index, started
at a value of 100 in 1994. Thus if the retail sectoral index value is
currently 150, that means that (inflation-adjusted) retail sales among
the firms that report data to us are 50 percent higher than in
January 1994. We also seasonally adjust each sector, and the
composite index, to correct for "normal" seasonal variation in the
data,
such as wet season vs. dry season, and so trends in the
seasonally-adjusted composite index provide a better indication of
underlying growth and fundamental change
in the economy. Each month's report reflects data
gathered from the
previous month. For example, the "August 2003" report reflects
data from July
2003. As is common, our initial report is
preliminary, and as we
receive final data we revise our reports accordingly. |
Cited References
American Automobile Association
California Association of Realtors
The Conference Board
Dow Jones Newswires
The
Federal Reserve Board's Beige Book
Freddie Mac
Institute of Supply Management
National Association of Realtors
The San Francisco Chronicle
The Wall Street Journal
U.S. Bureau of the Census's home
page
U.S.
Bureau of the Census's Economic Briefing Room
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic
Send us
your comments. Comments will be posted on our Reader
Comments page unless otherwise requested.