Center for Excellence in Learning & Teaching

Learning & Teaching Topics

Formative Classroom Assessment:

A learner-centered way to informally assess how students are learning throughout the semester in order to improve the quality of student learning.

Formative assessments are quick, relatively easy, and provide an excellent way to “check in” and receive feedback on learning effectiveness without the stress (for students or teachers) of formal exams and projects. Formative assessments can be used at any time, intermingled with more formal feedback styles such as traditional summative and graded assessments. Formative assessments can include everything from short hand-written papers to electronic “clicker” instant feedback in large lecture courses.

Examples of Formative Classroom Assessment Techniques:

Minute Paper Take one to three minutes at the end of class to ask students to write down the most important point from class that day as well as any unanswered questions they may have. This can help instructors assess what students are learning and which points need clarification in future class sessions.

Muddiest Point Give students two to three minutes to write about what they felt was the “muddiest point” of that day’s lecture. This technique can be used at the middle or end of a topic that might be confusing to students. Instructors can then use this information to provide clarification when necessary.

Background Knowledge Probe: This is a helpful technique that can be used at the beginning of a course or unit in order to determine how much students already know and to determine the starting level of the particular group of students. This probe can take the form of multiple choice questions and/or short answer questions on the topic. After the results are tabulated, instructors can review the results with the class and provide additional resources.

Misperception/Perception Check: This technique is particularly helpful when dealing with controversial or sensitive issues. A short answer or multiple choice assessment that will help instructors assess how well students distinguish between fact and opinion and, after tabulating the results, can discuss these issues with the class.

Topic References

Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Technique Examples. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from Honolulu Community College Web site: http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/assess-2.htm

Emerson, D.M., Plank, K.M., & Johnson, R.N.. (2007). An Introduction to Classroom Assessment Techniques. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from Penn State Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence Web site: http://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/pdf/Classroom_Assessment_Techniques_Intro.pdf

Felder, R. (1992). What do they know, anyway? Chemical Engineering Education, 26(3), 134-135. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from North Carolina State University Web site: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Columns/Eval.html

New Horizons for Learning. (1995). Assessment Terminology: A Glossary of Useful Terms. Retreived April 14, 2009, from New Horizons Web site: http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/assess/terminology.htm

Stassen, M.L.A., Doherty, K., & Poe, M.. (2001). Course-Based Review and Assessment: Methods for Understanding Student Learning. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from University of Massachusetts Web site: http://www.umass.edu/oapa/oapa/publications/online_handbooks/course_based.pdf (54 page PDF)

Truckee Meadows Community College. (2009). Classroom Assessment Techniques. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from Truckee Meadows Community College Web site: http://www.tmcc.edu/vp/aa/assessment/support/cat/

Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501.

HSU Connection

One formative assessment method is the MidSemester Evaluation. HSU offers the opportunity for instructors to receive valuable feedback through the MidSemester Evaluation program, where a trained facilitator first meets with the instructor to discuss the course, then meets with the students for 20-30 minutes in order to gather feedback, then presents that feedback to the instructor in a written report as well as a face-to-face meeting. This process is voluntary, anonymous, confidential, and has no bearing on faculty evaluations or tenure. It is simply meant for assessment and improvement. For more information, please contact Diane Johnson (.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)), or read her article from Exchanges:

Johnson, D.L. (2006). Course Evaluations at Mid-Term: Lessons Learned.Exchanges: The On-Line Journal of Teaching and Learning in the CSU. Retrieved on April 14, 2009, from Exchanges Web site: http://www.calstate.edu/ITL/exchanges/research/1215_Johnson.html