Economics 423 -- Environmental and Natural Resources Economics

Mid-Term Examination 1, Fall 2002, Professor Steven Hackett

 

Part I: Each question is worth three points                                ANSWER KEY

 

Price

Quantity Supplied

Quantity Demanded

10

100

1900

20

200

1700

30

300

1500

40

400

1300

50

500

1100

60

600

900

70

700

700

80

800

500

90

900

300

100

1000

100

 

1. What is the equilibrium price __70___ and quantity ___700___ in the table above?

 

2. At what price in the table above is there a surplus of 600? ___90___

 

3. Which of the following, if any, would cause equilibrium quantity to increase? (circle any/all correct answers)

 

Increase in demand                                           Increase in supply

 

Internalizing a positive externality                       Decrease in supply

 

 

4. Which of the following, if any, would cause equilibrium price to rise? (circle any/all correct answers)

 

Increase in demand                                           Internalizing a negative externality

 

Decrease in demand                                         Decrease in supply

 

 

5. True/False (circle one): Tyranny of the majority can happen when a diverse society sets social policy under a utilitarian system of ethics, but cannot happen if this society sets social policy under a deontological system of ethics.

False because in a diverse society, the majority can tyrannize the minority under a deontological ethical system (e.g., Taliban, Puritanism, etc).

 

6. True/False (circle one): Under teleological ethics, one has a categorical imperative or duty to act in a certain way.

False. The statement is true for deontological ethics, not teleological.

 

7. True/False (circle one): If a Pigouvian tax is larger than what it costs a firm to clean up its pollution emissions, then the firm will generally choose to clean up its emissions rather than pay the Pigouvian tax.

True because a firm can reduce its costs by cleaning up and avoiding the tax.

 

8. True/False (circle one): There is relatively little evidence to support the hypothesis that environmental regulations have had a large adverse effect on the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing.

True. This is a direct quote from Jaffe et al. (1995) in Chapter 1 of the textbook.

 

9. True/False (circle one): Scarcity is an artificial construct created by corporations and the media, and did not exist in pre-industrial societies.

False because available food and shelter resources, as well as the amount of time and energy available to people, have always been scarce.

 

10. True/False (circle one): As the term is used in this class, economic rationality requires that people must conform to the preferences and materialistic tendencies of the dominant consumer culture.

False. Re-read definition and discussion in Chapter 1 for details.

 

11. True/False (circle one): A market failure occurs when one or more of the conditions required for a well-functioning competitive market is not met in a substantial way.

True. This is a direct quote from the textbook glossary.

 


Part II. Matching: There is one unique match for each of the 10 statements (3 points each)

 

Word or Phrase

Statement

A. Price too low, quantity too large

__M_1. This restricts the ability of the US government to take private property rights

B. Price too high, quantity too low

__I_2. If you have this you are an authorized entrant, but you are not an authorized user

C. Negative pecuniary externality

__C_3. This externality occurs when a restaurant's profitability declines due to several new restaurants opening nearby

D. Positive externality

__H_4. If you have this you are an authorized user

E. Kaldor-Hicks efficient

__A_5. This describes the distortion of the market equilibrium due to negative externalities

F. Pareto efficient

__L_6. This is the term for those who hold access, withdrawal, and management rights

G. Efficient resource allocation in a market

__J_7. This ownership regime is res nullis (no property)

H. Fishing license

__O_8. This is a government intervention in a market that internalizes negative externalities

I. Season visitor pass to CA State Parks

__K_9. One must have this in order to bring a lawsuit under common law

J. Open access

__E_10. This judges social policy to be efficient when net social benefits are maximized relative to all other options, even if some people are made worse off

K. Legal standing

 

L. Claimant

 

M. Takings clause of the 5th Amendment

 

N. Government failure

 

O. Pigouvian tax

 

 

 

 

 

 


Part III. Computational Analysis

 

Suppose that demand is given by the equation P = 10,000 - 10Q

Private-cost supply is given by the equation P = 1000 + 10Q

Social-cost supply is given by the equation P = 3000 + 10Q

Marginal external cost is $2000

 

1. (6 pts): Derive the numerical value for equilibrium price and quantity assuming that firms can freely pollute without regulation or reputational consequences. Please show your work.

 

P = $_5,500_               Q = __450__

 

10,000 – 10Q = 1,000 + 10Q è 20Q = 9,000 è Q = 450; P = 1,000 + 10*450 = $5,500

 

2. (5 pts): Derive the numerical value for the gross gains from trade to the market participants (ignoring negative externalities) associated with the correct answer to question 1 above. Please show your work.

 

Gross gains from trade = $__2,025,000__

 

CS = 0.5*[10,000-5,500]*450 = $1,012,500; PS = 0.5*[5,500-1,000]*450 = 1,012,500

TOTAL GAINS FROM TRADE = CS + PS = $2,025,000

 

3. (5 pts): Derive the numerical value for total external cost associated with the correct answer to question 1 above. Please show your work.

 

Total external cost = $___900,000__

 

SINCE MEC IS CONSTANT, TEC = MEC*Q = $2,000*450 = $900,000

 

4. (6 pts): Derive the numerical value for the true net gains from trade to market participants and society associated with the correct answer to questions 1-3 above. Please show your work.

 

True net gains from trade = $__1,125,000__

 

TRUE NET GAINS = GROSS GAINS – TOTAL EXTERNAL COST = $2,025,000 - $900,000 = $1,125,000

 

5. (5 pts): Derive the numerical value for equilibrium price and quantity assuming that a Pigouvian tax has fully internalized negative externalities. Please show your work.

 

P = $__6,500__           Q = ___350___

 

10,000 – 10Q = 3,000 + 10Q è 20Q = 7,000 è Q = 350; P = 3,000 + 10*350 = $6,500

 

6. (5 pts): Derive the numerical value for the true net gains from trade associated with the correct answer to question 5 above (assume that the proceeds of the Pigouvian tax goes to cleaning up the pollution or compensating those harmed by pollution). Please show your work.

 

True net gains from trade = $__1,225,000___

 

TRUE NET GAINS = 0.5*[10,000 – 3,000]*350 = $1,225,000

 

 

7. (5 pts): By how much, in dollar terms, does the Pigouvian tax above enhance market efficiency (as measured by increased gains from trade) relative to the unregulated case? Please show your work.

 

Increased gains from trade due to Pigouvian tax = $__100,000___

 

ANSWER TO QUESTION 6 – ANSWER TO QUESTION 4 = $100,000