Old Midterm Exams
Economics 423, Midterm Examination #1, Spring 2000
Ð Professor Hackett
Name: _________________________________ (4 points)
There are seven questions on this examination. Please
select any six to answer, and clearly cross out the one that you
do not want me to grade. Each question you answer will be worth
a maximum of 16 points.
1. Drawing upon your own interests, (a) make up
a very brief, simple example of a situation involving ecosystems,
natural resources, or the environment clearly illustrating that
scarcity, and thus economics, applies beyond commercial market activity.
(b) Briefly explain the concept of opportunity cost, and use your
example to illustrate.
a. Water in the Eel river is scarce
because there are more uses for it than is available at a zero price,
such as the current issue of diversion of river water for irrigation,
urban drinking water, and recreation in Sonoma County, which reduces
in-stream flows needed for salmonids.
b. Opportunity cost is the net value
of the best alternative to the current allocation. Thus the opportunity
cost of diverting water for Sonoma county is the forfeited value
of in-stream flows on the Eel needed for restoring salmonids.
2.Using your example in question 1 above, (a) briefly
but succinctly describe how different value systems lead to a different
ranking of alternatives and thus different rational economic choices.
(b) If "economy vs. environment" is used in the popular media to
characterize a choice in which both alternatives have economic value,
what is the true basis of conflict?
a. Among
Humboldt County residents it is likely that eliminating the Eel
river diversion yields larger net social benefits than the status-quo,
and thus is utilitarian-ethical from the Humboldt County point of
view, while among Sonoma County residents the opposite is likely
to be true.
b. If both sides have economic value
(ex: in-stream flows and salmonid restoration vs. agricultural irrigation)
then the true basis of conflict is the difference in preferences
and values and circumstances.
3. (a) Is a policy choice that is ethical from a
utilitarian perspective always Pareto efficient? Briefly explain
why or why not with a very brief illustrative example. In answering
this question, be sure to demonstrate your understanding of Pareto
efficiency. (b) If a well-functioning competitive market is in equilibrium,
is voluntary exchange between buyers and sellers Pareto efficient
compared to the status quo of no trade? Briefly explain why or why
not.
a. No. Utilitarianism states that
the ethical policy yields the largest net social utility, in which
case some may be made worse off. An example would be taxing the
10 richest people in the U.S. to fund environmental restoration
and end poverty. Pareto efficiency requires not only that net social
utility be increased, but that nobody be made worse off.
b. A well-functioning competitive
market in equilibrium is Pareto efficient because all market participants
receive gains from trade (consumer or producer surplus) that they
would not have received if they had not traded.
4. (a) Define a negative externality. (b) Provide
one clear example of a negative externality. (c) Briefly explain
how negative externalities distort otherwise well-functioning competitive
markets and lead to market failure. (d) Briefly describe one type
of government policy intervention that might resolve the market
failure due to negative externalities.
a. An uncompensated cost imposed
upon "third parties" (society and the environment) that occurs as
a side-effect of market or other exchanges.
b. Pollution (sulfur dioxide, oxides
of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc) emitted by coal-fired electric
generating facilities.
c. Firms supply along a private-cost
supply curve rather than the social-cost supply curve, implying
that market supply is overstated, market price is too low, and too
much of the good or service (ex: electricity) is produced and consumed.
d. A Pigouvian tax equal to marginal
external cost.
5. Suppose that commercial timber land generates
positive externalities by also being habitat for a non-game endangered
species. (a) Briefly explain how market systems answer the question
of "what to produce" and use this to answer why markets will not
adequately supply endangered species habitat. (b) Using a property
rights and ownership argument, briefly explain why traditional common
law would be inadequate to protect the endangered species. (c) If
the private property rights held by the landowner extend to the
habitat of the endangered species, what economic strategy or contractual
mechanism is available for concerned individuals to protect the
endangered species? (d) When fully implemented, how does the Endangered
Species Act change the property rights held by the landowner in
part "c" above?
a. Markets answer the "what to produce"
question by producing what market demand tells them to produce (consumer
soverignty). Markets will not adequately supply endangered species
or their habitat because they are external benefits and thus are
enjoyed without being paid-for, and thus are undersupplied in markets.
b. The land owner has the various
property rights associated with private ownership, including the
right to withdraw timber and impair habitat. Concerned individuals
cannot use the common law to sue for damages because the common
law only protects life and property, endangered species are not
recognized as the property of those who care about them, and the
habitat is the property of the landowner.
c. If the land owner cannot be forced
to protect the habitat because she has ownership rights on the land,
then concerned individuals can unite to purchase a conservation
easement on the land, or get government to offer tax subsidies for
habitat provision on private land.
d. When fully implemented, the ESA
essentially takes some ownership rights away from the private individual
as they pertain to the endangered species habitat, particularly
those associated with withdrawal and management.
6. Suppose that in a well-functioning competitive
market, demand is given by the equation P = 650 Ð Q, and (private-cost)
supply is given by the equation P = 150 + Q, where "P" is price
and "Q" is market quantity of some good or service. (a) Compute
the market equilibrium P and Q. (b) Compute the total gains from
trade (consumer and producer surplus). Show your work.
a. 650-Q = 150+Q è
500 = 2Q, and thus Q = 250. Plug 250 in for Q in either the supply
or the demand equation to get P = $400.
b. Total gains from trade: Draw the
diagram. Notice that consumer surplus is [$(650-400)*250]/2 = $31,250.
Likewise producer surplus is [$(400-150)*250]/2 = $31,250. Total
surplus is $62,500.
7. Suppose that production of each unit of output
Q above leads to a marginal external cost of $100. If we integrate
this marginal external cost into the market information in question
6 above, the equation for the social-cost supply curve is given
by P = 250 + Q. (a) By how much is output in question 6 in excess
of the socially efficient quantity, and by how much is price in
question 6 below the socially efficient price? (b) Compute the $
amount of deadweight social loss from the market failure that occurs
if society allows firms to continue to produce negative externalities
as described above. Show your work.
a. First
compute the equilibrium price and quantity based on the demand in
question 6 and the social-cost supply: 650-Q = 250+Q è
400 = 2Q, and thus Q = 200. Plug 200 in for Q in either the supply
or the demand equation to get P = $450. Thus we can see that quantity
in question 6 is too big by 50 units, while price in question 6
is too low by $50.
b. Deadweight loss is [marginal
external cost * excess quantity]/2 = [$100 * 50]/2 = $2,500.
|