Quiz 2, Economics 423, Fall 2007 (Prof. Hackett)
Name: ANSWER KEY Pick ONE question you do not want me to
grade and cross it out with a big “X”. Provide the very best answer to each of
the remaining 11. All questions are equally weighted and worth the same number
of points.
Part I: All students
1. True or false (circle one): If a job is similar to many
others but (i) involves an annual risk of premature
death on the job that is 0.00008 (8 per 100,000) higher, and (ii) pays a wage
premium of $480 per year, then based on this data, the value of a statistical
life is $6 million.
2. True or false (circle one): In the absence of individual
quotas, fishery management utilizing a total allowable catch and season
openings can induce a race for fish, or derby.
3. True or false (circle one): When individual quotas are
instituted in a heavily depleted commercial fishery suffering from
overcapitalization, allowing these quotas to be tradable will tend to reduce
overcapitalization by giving some fishers an incentive to sell their quota and
leave the fishery.
4. True or false (circle one): In the benefit/cost analysis
done by the California Energy Commission regarding removal of the Klamath River
dams, the costs include the present value of estimated expenditures to remove
the dams and provide alternative sources of electricity for those who had been
buying hydroelectric power from these dams.
5. True or false (circle one): Nonuse values
(such as existence value) can be estimated from a survey of visitors using the
travel cost method.
6. True or false (circle one): The demand
for a particular piece of legislation derives from the opportunity cost of the
legislator’s time, the legislator’s personal preferences, and how support for
the legislation affects the legislator’s prospects for re-election.
7. True or false (circle one): Results from
the median voter theorem explain why politicians tend to gravitate away from
the political center, where most of the voters are located, and closer to the
extreme positions of their respective political parties.
8. True or false (circle one): Duverger’s law states that a winner-takes-all election
system will result in an elimination of the two party system and instead
promote a large number of small independent political parties that will band
together to create a coalition government.
9. True or false (circle one): Economically valuable ecosystem
services, such as air and water purification, decomposition of wastes, and
renewal of soil fertility, represent the beneficial flow from the stock of
natural capital.
Part II: ONLY For students in
the 4th unit lab:
Suppose that there are 1000
units of a nonrenewable resource available over two periods (0 and 1). Demand
in each period is given by P = 2000 - Q. Marginal cost is a constant 400 in
both periods. The discount rate is 10 percent.
10. What is the dynamically
efficient allocation of the 1000 units of the nonrenewable resource, and what
will be the prices in the two periods? Please show your work.
Q0 = 552.38 P0 = $ 1,447.62
Q1 = 447.62 P1 = $ 1,552.38
11. Suppose that the basic
setup of the problem above were the same, except that now the discount rate
rises to 20 percent. Re-compute the dynamically efficient allocation of the
1000 units of the nonrenewable resource. Please show your work.
Q0 = 600 P0 = $ 1,400
Q1 = 400 P1 = $ 1,600
12. Correctly draw the price
paths for questions 1 and 2 above in a single fully-labeled diagram. Provide a
brief economic explanation for why the two price paths have different slopes.
Put price on the “y” axis and “time” on the “x” axis. Show
the two prices from answer 10, connected together with a line, and the two
prices from answer 11, likewise connected by a line. Show that the price path
from the answer to question 11 is steeper. Note that it is steeper because the
higher discount rate requires a larger allocation to the present, leaving less
for the future, relative to the lower discount rate. The higher the discount
rate the less important are future gains relative to current gains.
Part III. ONLY For students
who are NOT in the 4th unit lab.
. 
Suppose there are four
fishers working a fishery. An individual fisher’s share of group profit is
equal to the percentage of total effort that she provided. Use the above
table to derive the following:
10. Suppose the fishers agree
to each provide 2 units of effort (e.g., 2 fishing trips each) in order to
achieve the maximum level of group profit for a fishery. How much profit would each
individual fisher receive if each of the four provides 2 units of effort,
as they agreed (total effort = 8)? Show your work.
The group optimal effort is 8. Each individual fisher sets
effort at 2, and each individual fisher gets ¼ of total group profit of $1,400.
Individual fisher’s profit at
group optimum = $ 1,400/4 = $350
11. Suppose one of the
fishers decides to cheat on this agreement and provide 6 units of effort, while
the other 3 continue to provide 2 units of effort each. How much profit would
the cheater receive if she provides 6 units of effort, while the other
three fishers continue to provide 2 units of effort each (total effort = 12)?
Show your work.
The cheater sets effort at 6, or ½ of total effort. Cheater’s
gain is ½ of the total group gain of $900 that occurs when effort = 12.
Cheater’s profit = $450
12. How much profit would each
of the three individual non-cheaters receive if they continue to provide 2
units of effort, while the cheater provides 6 units of effort (total effort =
12)? Show your work.
The 3 non-cheaters each continue to provide 2 units of
effort. The three non-cheaters thus split the other half of the group profit
not captured by the cheater, thus, giving each individual $450/3 or $150.
Individual non-cheater’s
profit = $150
Briefly explain in words how
this example relates to the incentive to over-fish and perhaps lead to tragedy
of the commons.
The group-optimal effort level is fragile in that,
like a cartel, there is an incentive for fishers to cheat and provide more effort
than they agreed to provide. Achieving the group optimal agreement requires
durable social institutions, social capital, and monitoring and enforcement
activies.