A Patient with damage in the Parietal Cortex: by Ryan Kelly All individuals in this world are potential victims for some type of brain damage whether it be cancer or some type of lesion. Unfortunately, brain damage is not sight specific causing every part of the brain to be potentially altered. In this specific case the study has been focused on the region of the parietal cortex and it's responsibilities. Specifically, this study will be looked at from a patient who has suffered a lesion in the left parietal lobe. Also, because of it's importance, I will zoom in on the right parietal lobe too, and it's behavioral effects due to a lesion. First, to get a basic understanding of a healthy parietal cortex and it's functions, it will be examined first. The parietal lobe is located near the back of the brain, towards the top of the head (Carlson, 2001). Overall, it's assumed that it facilitates spatial perception and allows a sensation of the body's position in the body (2001). Basic functions that it is responsible for are location for visual attention, touch perception, goal directed voluntary movements, and manipulation of objects (Zaidel, 1994). If any type of damage takes place in the parietal lobe an individual could experience a malfunction of one of these characteristics. In the past, individuals experiencing a lesion or any other type of brain damage to the parietal cortex have developed many pre-dispositions, and have lost a major part of the working brain. Such characteristics are represented by the inability to attend to more than one object at a time, the inability to name an abject (Anomia), and the inability to locate the words for writing (Agraphia), among many others (Zaidel, 1994). The point is these patients suffering from these types of disabilities have to deal with an altered perception of the world; a perception that one time was considered normal before the lesion took place. Basically, their thinking capabilities have decreased extremely and they have to conform to the new weaknesses of their brain. Damage to the left parietal lobe can result in what is called "Gerstmann's Syndrome" (Zaidel, 1994). A patient suffering from this syndrome could develop behavioral effects that include right/left confusion, difficulty with writing, and difficulty with mathematics (1994). It can also produce disorders of language (aphasia) and the inability to perceive objects normally (agnosia). A patient who has developed aphasia and agnosia has to change there basic everyday activities. Many individuals are never able to develop a normal life again because of the brain damage they have developed. They have to design a new life. This task can be overwhelming for some individuals causing severe psychological deficits. For example, in a specific case study, a forty six year old man was complaining about a reoccurring acute confusional state. Certain symptoms that he listed of having were agitated visual problems. He said that he was able to see letters written on the board but that he was unable to process them. After a visual field examination, they stated that he had a right/left disorientation (Turkenberg, 1988). The CT scan showed that he had a lesion in the left parietal cortex. Doctors predicted that other behavioral effects that may occur due to this lesion is alcalculia (difficulty in calculation), agraphia (difficulty in writing), right/left disorientation, and finger agnosia (difficulty in identifying the fingers and naming them (Zaidel, 1994). Because of these altered behaviors this individual will spend a large amount of his future learning about how to cope with his new mental representation. Since there are two sides to the parietal cortex there can be a mix in behavioral effects, depending on which side develops a malfunction. If the superior parietal lobe (SPL) becomes damaged it can lead to problems in visually guided action in the context of intact perception and awareness, whereas damage to the inferior parietal cortex (IPL) can potentially produce deficits in visual perception and awareness with relatively preserved action (Anderson, 1995). Also, the parietal cortex is divided into two sections, the left and right sides. The right side has different tasks compared to the left, so if an individual develops a lesion on the right side there can be different symptoms. Individuals who have a lesion on the right side of the parietal cortex have a chance of developing unilateral neglect, in which they lose awareness for visual events on the contralesional side (left) of space. In this type of case the patient might have a hard time carrying out tasks on the left side, compared to the right. For example, he/she might forget to eat the food on the left side of the plate unintentionally, while all the food is gone on the right side. They might also be unaware of shaving the right side of the face while not even touching the left side. One other effect is having a hard time reading the words on the left side of a printed page in a book (Berkowitz, 1992). It is possible for both sides of the parietal lobe to be damaged also. Bilateral damage is when both sides of the parietal lobe have sustained lesions. This can cause Balints Syndrome, a visual attention and motor deficit (Berkowitz, 1992). Characteristics of this occurrence are inability to voluntarily control gazing and ocular apraxia. An individual who sustains a lesion in the parietal cortex can typically suffer strong psychological problems. As it was pointed out earlier, this individual will have to cope with life in a new designed way. In one study, selected patients reported that the environment appears to be confused and jumbled and they have a tough time judging the location of two objects relative to one another. Other ongoing concerns that a patient may experience are self esteem levels, conflict management, fatigue, stress, anxiety, and assertiveness, among others (Berk, 2001). Basically the life of the patient has done a half rotation. Different doctors and therapists are aides in helping the patient learn how their new brain works. Patients have to learn a new way about going on with life. Doctors help them create substitutions for how to read and write, plus how to overcome other malfunctions that have arisen (Berk, 2001). For instance, if a patient has suffered from verbal apraxia, he/she has to learn a new form of communication whether it be speech clarification or some other alternative. Relationships with others can be a problem, especially if the patient has lost the will to communicate. Perhaps the biggest problem for a patient who has sustained a lesion in the parietal cortex is financing the whole recovery. Not only do they have to pay for there physical and mental disability they have to pay for it also. The mental health systems and medical programs have to combine in helping these individuals overcome an unstable environment. Since there can be many different effects from a lesion in the parietal cortex, doctors have not been able to create one type of cure or rehabilitation program for the patients. There are to many areas to focus on and each one brings individual problems. Each patient will be different in how they deal with this ordeal. There is no one answer in dealing with a malfunction in the parietal cortex because they are all different in some way. Plus, the psychological effects have a wide range too. As we head into the future it will continue to be a long journey in developing a substitution for the parietal cortex if it becomes injured. References: Anderson, R. A. (1995). Coordinate transformations and motor planning in posterior parietal cortex, in M.S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, MIT Press, pp. 519-532). Berk, L. E. (2001). Human Development. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Berkowitz, L. (1992). The Working Brain. New York: Wiley- Interscience. Carlson, R. L. (2001). Physiology of Behavior. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon. Turkenberg, J.L., Swaab, D.F., Endert, E., Lawrence, A.L., and van de Poll, N.E. Brain Research Bulletin, 1988, 21, 215-224. Zaidel, W. D. (1994). NeuroPsychology. San Diego, Ca: Academic Press. Parietal Cortex Spouse and other family members Sheila Herbst When a family member has determined they are dealing with a tumor that is on the parietal cortex of the brain. The parietal cortex is located in the cerebral cortex which may be anatomically defined as the higher order center of the central nervous system. It is composed of embryological divisions, called lobes (with gyri and sulci) which are functionally interdependent, though organized and localized with respect to primary attributes such as motor, sensory, emotion, and special senses. There are intimate associations of these regions with high order subcortical regions as well as the brain stem and spinal cord. (Crammond, 1997) I had discovered that located in the primary parietal lobe there are essentially four submodalities of somatic sensation: Pain, Thermal, Touch-Pressure and Position-Kenesia (ie. Limb position and sense of joint movements). Somatosensory cortex is highly organized by input source—and the body regions capabilities of the greatest sensitivity occupy the greatest amount of the somatosensory cortex. Pathways contain somatosensory information from the body and from the head—the dorsal column-medial lemniscation system, the spinothalamic system, and the trigeminalthalamic system and trigeminoreticular system. (Carlson, 1998) The tumor can be either benign or malignant. If the tumor is benign then it is made up of benign (harmless) cells and has distinct boundaries. Surgery alone may cure this type of tumor. If it is malignant then the tumor is life-threatening. It might be malignant because it consists of cancer cells or it may be malignant due to its location. A brain tumor even though it consists of benign cells is malignant due to the location. This spouse is suffering form a life- threatening tumor because of the location in the parietal cortex. (ABTA, 1991) The causes of brain tumors are unknown, which bothers family members the most. To know that science has not been able to determine how brain tumors start is what scares family members the most. Due to the fact that we do not know how they start we are unable to prevent them from occurring. Environmental agents, familial tendencies, viral causes, and other possibilities are under investigation. However they know that brain tumors are not contagious which brings me a relief for the family. (ABTA, 1991) Symptoms that are caused form having a tumor on the parietal lobe vary. Seizures, speech disturbances if the tumor is in the dominant (usually left) hemisphere and loss of ability to write (agraphia) are common symptoms. Also spatial disorders, such as difficulty with body orientation in space or recognition of body parts may also occur. (ABTA, 1991) I have found many support groups for the family to get involved in to help them deal with all the new changes they are about to encounter. National Brain Tumor Foundation Support Group Listings 1(800) 934-CURE (2873) Cancer Care Counseling Line 1 (800) 813-HOPE (4673) National Family Caregivers Association 1 (800) 896-3650 Well Spouse Foundation 1 (800) 838-0879 Wellness Community (310) 453-2300 (National Headquarters. Being able to have a network of people to help the family cope with such hard issues will help the patient as well. When the family is able to deal with the issue of a tumor and have a positive outlook to be supportive then the family will be better off. (NBTF, 2000) The NBTF Support Network is a telephone service for brain tumor patients and their families in which individuals can be connected to other brain tumor survivors or caregivers. These NBTF volunteers offer information, stories, support, and an understanding ear. If you are interested in being connected to another survivor or caregiver please call the Patient Services Department at (800) 934-CURE or send us email. These types of services are located almost everywhere and families should take advantage of them. (NBTF, 2000) Lesions and electrophysiological studies indicate the parietal lobes play a role in visual and spatial attention and in computing the spatial coordinates of visual input. Fewer studies have investigated the role of the parietal lobe in auditory spatial processing and an extensive comparison of visual and auditory spatial processing in humans with parietal lobe lesions has yet to be conducted. We have studied such localization abilities in a Balint's syndrome patient (RM) who has bilateral parietal lobe lesions. The results indicated that this patient had a significant deficit in both visual and auditory localization relative to age-matched controls. Unlike the controls, however RM's auditory localization ability either matched or exceeded his visual localization ability depending on the task. Accordingly, RM exhibited "auditory capture" but not "visual capture" under conditions where control subjects showed the opposite pattern. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the parietal lobes are involved with creating multiple spatial representations in shifting form one spatial reference point to another, but suggest that these parietal structures are not necessary for the integration of multiple sensory stimuli resulting in capture effects. (Phan, 2000 Abstract from author) Dealing with either a tumor or a lesion is difficult for family members and patients. The surgery that may be involved can be very stressful for those involved. Dealing with the brain and having any type of surgery is very dangerous. References: American Brain Tumor Association. A Primer of Brain Tumors. ABTA, 1991. Carlson, Neil R. Physiology of Behavior. Allyn and Bacon: 1998. Crammond, Donald J. Trends in Neurosciences. Elsevier Science Ltd. February 1997, Volume20. Haupt, C. and U. Ancker. "Therapy of Brain Tumors" November 1995. http://cancer.med.upenn.edu/cancernet/95/nov/711551.html#25 Marangolo, Paola and Enrico Di Pace. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press, November 1998, Volume 10. National Brain Tumor Foundation. http://www.braintumor.org/pservices/bsbtfaq.asp#1 Phan, M. L. and K. L. Schandel. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press, July 2000, Volume 12. Powell, Michael. BMJ: British Medical Journal. BMJ Publishing Group, April 2000. Jennifer Crawley Social Worker I've been working as a social worker for quite a long time now. Just recently it was my first time that I have the chance to work with a man that has apraxia of speech. Apraxia of speech is to refer to all surface articulatory disorders resulting from motor speech programming deficits. The first time I met him is when he first found out that he had cancer. The doctor found a tumor that was on his left parietal cortex. The only thing they were able to do was removal the tumor. Before the surgery, he was hesitating in going through with the surgery and I reinsured him that it was the right thing to do. When I would meet with him, he was very talkative in a smarty pants way. The doctors told him of all the consequences and the worst scenario would be not able to talk. I advised him going to therapy before hand to help deal with the change but of course he didn't take my advice. At the time in his life he had all he every wanted, kids, a perfect wife and the job of his dreams. He was well known in the town and a good accountant. After the surgery, I visited him once a week to see how things were holding up. He couldn't talk much or even tried to make eye contact. I could tell that this was the turning point in his life. When the doctor released him, he started to mumble a lit bit, but still couldn't make any words out. I could see in his eyes that he was already depressed and didn't want to see anyone. He just sat in the room while his wife took care of the kids and the house. He was being very stubborn and acted like he didn't even exist. After a couple of weeks went by, I started to visit him more frequently. Now he was able to speak about five words in about two minutes. There were long pauses in between each word and on a good day there would be about three to five rehearsal of a word. His wife was getting worried and wanted my help to get him on the road of recovery. During my visit, I would give him a list of control phrases for example; I have to go to the bathroom and a topic specific dictionary of words or other symbols. He started to communicate better and wasn't getting so flustered. Once the break through he wanted to go back to work. When he did take that next step, people were staring at him and all of his friends wanted to come and talk to him. They never realized that he wasn't the same guy. I knew that he trying very hard to not let that bring him down. I gave some advice to see a therapist and gave him the information about a support group that helps people like him. For once he finally realized that it was time to seek help. The group did wonders, he learned to control the number of rehearsals for a word and he felt like he was getting the hang of things. During the group sessions he saw others with devices and they can communicate a lot better than just writing things down on paper. I looked around and found what he was looking for. The talking word board system, it is a symbol and content free so that symbol sets are completely flexible and can be selected commensurate with the user's cognitive, linguistic and visual skills. He takes it to work and things slow progressed. With the new device and the group therapy, he is starting a new that he can deal with. He knows now that talking is not the most important part of communication, facial and eye contact is what he enjoys the most. As time goes on, technology is developing fast and who knows what else can be offered to people with speech impairment. Bibliography Acquired Apraxia Of Speech in Aphasic Adults. Paula Square –storer. Taylor and Francis, 1989. Sarah Soper Lesion to Parietal Cortex- Neurologist The cortex of the cerebrum in the human brain is divided into four surface lobes: frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital. Each area has its own set of functions and responsibilities that are associated with specific behaviors of the body (Mader,1997). The parietal lobe in particular has sensory areas that are responsible for the sensations of temperature, touch, pressure, and pain from the skin. It is this portion of the brain that receives nerve impulses from certain sense organs so that we can register, carry out implied actions, and understand our sensory experiences (Mader,1997). Neurology is the medical science that deals with the study of the nervous system and the disorders that affect it(Wilkinson,1999). So, in the case of a lesion to part of the brain, a neurologist would be one to study the individual on a neuronal level. Finding and measuring synapse patterns and their chemical usage within the various brain parts and using this information to provide knowledge for the field, as well as feedback to the patient as far as diagnosis and prognosis(Wilkinson,1999). A lesion is damage to some part of the brain caused by various instances, including a head trauma or a stroke. What generally happens with lesions is the damaged portion of the brain can no longer function to the full ability or in the same way as it had previously, leading to a change in behavior (Mader,1997). Often, lesions to any part of the cortex will lead to apraxia, which is characterized by the loss of the ability to initiate or carry out very familiar learned movements despite having the desire and physical capability to do so (Faglioni,1985). Lesions to the parietal cortex have been shown to cause both ideomotor and ideational apraxias. Ideomotor apraxia is the inability to carry out a motor command. A person with this damage would have difficulty pulling their hand from a fire or pointing to an object of desire (Faglioni,1985). Ideational apraxia is the inability to create a plan for or idea of a specific movement. A person with this damage would have difficulty drawing a specific figure or reaching to scratch an itchy nose (Faglioni, 1985). It has been shown that parietal damage brings about apraxia by severing the pathways transmitting visual and audio-verbal information to the sensomotorium (Faglioni,1985). This means that sensory information coming in would not make it through the circuit that would tell the muscles how to react to this information. The job of a neurologist is to help diagnose what exactly is happening within the central nervous system of the patient based on a personal account of the symptoms from the patient as well as observed behavioral differences from what is normal by the doctor. A neurologist will take the behavioral information and correlate it with the available knowledge of brain activity and function and attempt to pinpoint exactly where a problem is going on (Wilkinson,1999). If a patient were to come in complaining that they did not have control over the movement of their arm, the neurologist would ask questions to find out exactly what the patient could and could not do with their arm and other parts of the body. Generally the symptoms would point to a specific region of the brain that is affected and perhaps even more refined, the specific neuron pathway that no longer functions (Wilkinson,1999). Once the affected area is discovered it is time to figure out what can be done about it. Optimally the damaged area can be repaired through the work of a neurosurgeon and begin transmitting information properly for normal behavior. Often though, this is not possible and a patient has to spend considerable time with a neuropsychologist in order to relearn how to manage their lives as functionally as possible. Faglioni,P. & A. Basso. Historical Perspectives on Apraxia. 3-44. Advances in Psychology: Neuropsychological Studies of Apraxia and Related Disorders. Oxford: North-Holland,1985. Mader, S.L. Inquiry Into Life. Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1997. Wilkinson, I.M.S. Neurology 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1999. Apraxia of Speech-A Neurosurgeons Perspective by Tom Cave The patients presenting problem is a neurogenic phonologic selection and sequencing problem called apraxia of speech. Patients will report that they have a clear idea of what they intend, but cannot get the speech sequence started, or keep it rolling once it is started. (Human Communication Disorders, Shames and Wiig) The etiology for apraxia of speech is brain damage-most likely a unilateral,left hemisphere lesion involving the third frontal convolution (Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia, Chapey). Damage can occur from the robbing of nutritional requirements from surrounding healthy tissue or the pressing and impinging of a growing mass of cells on surrounding tissue. The Skull contains the brain, the cerebrospinal fluid (csf), and blood. Whenever any one of these three components increases in volume, intracranial pressure rises. A tumor increases the mass contained within the skull and may block the flow of csf. Nausea, vomiting, and headaches are created by pressure in the brain caused by the growing tumor and by the accumulation of csf. All of which are symptoms reported by the patient. When volume increases, the brain may be compromised in several ways: structures may be displaced; signal transmission may be impaired; nerves may be compressed; possibly fatal hemorrhaging may occur; the optic nerve may become swollen; and accumulation of csf may develop (Oncology World.Com). All of which may complicate surgery. The presence of a sustained increase in intracranial pressure can be significant in the assessment of a patient within a neurological disorder. The normal range for intracranial pressure is between 50 and 180 mm H2O, however our patient has an abnormally high reading of 200 mm H20. Any condition that causes an increase in volume in one or more of the structures within the cranium will cause an increase in pressure with in the contained area (Miller-Keane Medical Dictionary 2000). The patients recent history then indicates the possibility of a brain tumor. Braintumors are abnormal growths of tissue found inside the skull. The word tumor is used to describe both abnormal growths that are new (neoplasms) and those present at birth (congenital tumors). No matter where they are located in the body, tumors are usually classed as benign (non cancerous) if the cells that make up the growth are similar to other normal cells, grow relatively slowly, and are confined to one location. Tumors are called malignant (cancerous) when the cells are very different from normal cells, grow relatively quickly, and can spread easily to other locations. When a doctor suspects a brain tumor because of a patients symptoms one can turn to a number of specialized tests and techniques to confirm the diagnoses. The first test is often a traditional neurological exam, which checks; reflexes, hearing, sensation, movement, balance, and coordination. The next step in diagnosing brain tumors often involves X-rays or imaging techniques and laboratory tests that can detect the presence of a tumor and provide clues about its location and type. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have dramatically improved the diagnosis of brain tumors. For my patient I have opted to use a MRI because it can often distinguish more accurately between healthy and diseased tissue. MRI gives better pictures of tumors located near bone than CT, does not use radiation as CT does, and provides pictures from various angles that can enable one to construct a three dimensional image of the tumor (Web MD). The MRI scan revealed a tumor in the lateral posterior cortex in Brodmann's area 40 (Journal of Neuroscience, Jonides et al). A surgeon may have difficulty in knowing where a tumor ends and the normal brain begins. Consequently, prior to surgery a volumetric stereotaxis will be performed. Volumetric stereotaxis is a method for gathering, storing and reformatting imaging derived three dimensional volumetric information defining an intracranial lesion with respect to the surgical field. With this technique a surgeon can plan and simulate the surgical procedure beforehand, reach deep seated or centrally located tumors employing the safest and least invasive route possible. Advantages for patients include: the smallest possible skin incision, craniotomy and brain invasion; a more complete tumor removal can be accomplished with less risk to surrounding tissue; and postoperative neurological results are better (Patrick J. Kelly, MD). Prior to surgery small markers (feducials) that show up in an MRI are applied to the patients head. The patient is placed in an MRI unit and a series of images are obtained. This data is transferred to a computer in the operating room. The computer reconstructs the MRI images and produces a three dimensional picture of the head and lesion in three planes. After the patient is anesthetized, the head is pinned in a head frame to rigidly hold it in place. The feducials are registered on the MRI and are matched to the corresponding feducial on the patients head. The latter is accomplished with a pointer containing an array of light emitting diodes. A receiver positioned near the operating table registers the position of the diodes and thus the position of the head feducials. This information is transferred directly to the computer. The pointer can then be used to direct the surgeon to the lesion with no more than a 1-2 mm error (Your Surgery.Com). A parietal craniotomy is to be performed. This entails making a trap door in the skull to expose its contents. An incision must be made in the scalp and the scalp is then peeled back to expose the bone of the skull. One or several holes (about ˝ inch in diameter) are made in the skull using a special saw. Then the plate of bone is removed, exposing the outer membrane covering the brain-or dura mater. The dura mater is cut and the surface of the brain is thus exposed. The operation to remove the tumor proceeds. When this is completed, the dura is usually closed with sutures and the bone plate is replaced. The scalp is then closed (Patrick J. Kelly, MD). After surgery,a biopsy is performed by taking a small sample of tissue from the tumor. By examining the sample under a microscope a pathologist can tell what kind of cells are in a tumor, looking for certain changes that signal cancer; abnormal growth in the cell membranes and problems in the cell nuclei. Using this information, the pathologist provides a diagnosis of the tumor type. The tumor may also be classified as benign or malignant which helps predict the likely outcome for the patient after surgery. Tumor and surgery can result in swelling inside the cranium. Consequently, a prescription to reduce this swelling will be provided in the form of dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, or prednisone (Web MD). References: Human Communication Disorders. Shames and Wiig pgs. 501 and 510. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Roberta Chapey. Pg.424. Oncology World. Com Miller-Keane Medical Dictionary 2000 Web MD. National Institute of neurological Disorders and Stroke. Journal of Neuroscience 4/22/01, Jonides et al. Patrick J. Kelly, MD. http://mcns 10. med.nyu. edu/tumor/brain. Your Surgery.Com Web MD, Brain and spinal cord tumors. Parietal Lesion- Neuropsychological Perspective BY: Laramie Lesina I saw the patient two days after a lesion occurred in the parietal lobe of the brain. The patient is a fifty year old Caucasian male with no previous serious medical history. The man was involved in an automobile accident and was thrown from the vehicle experiencing serious open head injuries. These injuries resulted in lesions to the right and left hemispheres of the parietal lobe. The parietal lobe is located just behind the frontal lobe in the cerebral hemisphere and is separated from it by a shallow groove called the central sulcus. The parietal lobe is the sensory area responsible for sensations of temperature, touch, pressure and pain from the skin. Its association areas function speech and the use of words, thoughts, and feelings (Parietal Lobes). Damage to the left parietal includes, right and left confusion, difficulty writing and difficulty with mathematics. It can also produce disorders of language and the inability to perceive objects normally (Parietal Lobe Functions). Damage to the right parietal hemisphere includes, contralateral neglect, which can impair many self-care skills such as dressing and washing. Right side damage can also cause difficulty in making things, denial of deficits, and drawing ability (Parietal Lobe Functions). Upon psychological evaluation, the left hemisphere of the parietal lobe seems to have suffered the most damage, but the right parietal damage is also of a concern. The left hemisphere of the parietal lobe is associated with language and perception. I have concluded that this individual is experiencing several types of apraxia due to the severity of the accident and the head injures that the patient has. When assessing for Ideomotor Apraxia I requested that the patient demonstrates the usage of a tool, I asked if he could show me how to cut with scissors. I noticed that the patient was having difficulties with his hands, as he seemed to randomly move them in space. After he displayed this disoriented behavior I concluded that Ideomotor Apraxia was apparent. The patient also suffers from Ideational Apraxia due to the fact that he cannot perform a series of acts in sequence even though he can perform these tasks individually. This area of apraxia results from a loss of the conceptual knowledge associated with objects and the overall goal of the activity sequence (Behavioral Neuropsychology). The third type of apraxia the patient suffers from id Buccofacial Apraxia. He has difficulties performing skilled movements with his lips, tongue, face, larynx and pharynx. He has been substituting verbal expressions for the movements; this is a classic sigh of Buccofacial Apraxia (Behavioral Neuropsychology).In my opinion the patient suffers from verbal apraxia. He now has the inability to produce sentences and communication id very hard for the patient. His frustration is very noticeable. I will request a Physical Therapist for help with walking, transfers and wheelchair help throughout the facility. An Occupational Therapist will be provided for help with visual and perceptual tasks as well as ADL activities (Activities if daily living). A speech Therapist will be used to help establish and direct communication between patient and staff as well as the communication with his family members. The Speech Therapist will monitor whether or not the staff is communicating appropriately with the patient. A Recreational Therapist will assist in the rehabilitation process by interacting with the patient by doing things that the patient is interested in doing; the therapist will also assist with the speech rehabilitation team. To complete the rehabilitation team there will be a team of nurses to assist with the patients' immediate commands, bowl and bladder function as well as skin care. My prognosis for this individual is fair. The head injuries that he has suffered from are severe but not untreatable. He will need to have an extensive rehabilitation team for the first few months of recovery. Followed by outpatient rehabilitation for at least one year. References: Clinical Neuropsychology: Behavioral Neuropsycholoy. [Online], Available: http://nanonline.org/NANdistanCE/mtbi/ClinNeuro/apraxia.html Parietal Lobe Function: Parietal Lobes [Online], Available: http://www.neuroskills.com/tbi/bparieta.html Parietal Lobes. [Online}, Available: http://www.mnerbody.com/text/nerv43,htmlReturn to the Project Table of Contents
Copyright © 2001, Dr. John M. Morgan, All rights reserved -
This page last edited 7 - May, 2001
If you have any feedback for the author, E-mail me