Humboldt State University ® Department of Chemistry

Richard A. Paselk

Chem 110

General Chemistry

Fall 2003

Lecture Notes::Lec 10_17 September

© R. Paselk 2003
 
     
PREVIOUS  

NEXT

DG Calculations, cont.

Last time we started our look at the various methods of calculating free energy with the "formula" method. Let's now look at teh next two methods.

2. Hess's Law method (DG is a state function and path independent):

Example:

2 CO(g) + O2(g) Æ 2 CO2(g)

From tabulated reactions we have:

1) 2 CH4(g) + 3 O2(g) Æ 2 CO(g) + 4 H2O(g)
DG° = -1088 kJ/mol

2) CH4(g) + 2 O2(g) Æ CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g)
DG° = -801 kJ/mol

Reversing reaction (1) and multiplying reaction (2) by 2 to cancel methane:

2 CO(g) + 4 H2O(g) Æ 2 CH4(g) + 3 O2(g)
DG° = +1088 kJ/mol

2 x (CH4(g) + 2 O2(g) Æ CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g))
DG° = -1602 kJ/mol

We can add these reactions to give:

2 CO(g) + O2(g) Æ 2 CO2(g) 
DG° = -514 kJ/mol

3. Use Df: This is just like using Df, and is obviously the easiest. However tabulations of Df are often unavailable, so the other methods must be used.

Example. Consider the complete combustion of methanol:

CH3OH(g) + 3/2 O2(g) Æ CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g)

From a table:

  Df (kJ/mol)
CH3OH(g) -163
O2(g) 0
CO2(g) -394
H2O(g) -229

We can now find Df from the formula:

DG° = SnpDf(prod) - SnrDf(rct)

DG° = Df(CO2(g)) + 2 Df(H2O(g)) - Df(CH3OH(g))

DG° = -394 kJ/mol + 2 (-229 kJ/mol) - (-163 kJ/mol) = -689 kJ/mol

 

The Pressure Dependence of DG

We've been looking at the calculation of DG under standard conditions. How does it change with deviations from standard conditions? We will look first at the change in DG with changes in pressure for an ideal gas because of its theoretical simplicity.

First recall the formula for free energy, DG = DH -TDS.

Slarge V > Ssmall V

since the particles are more spread out and more difficult to describe (positional entropy).

Similarly, we expect the entropy to be affected by pressure (positional entropy):

Slow P > Shigh P

It turns out (the derivation is beyond our scope) that the free energy for an ideal gas under non-standard pressure is related to standard conditions by:

DG = DG° + RTlnP

Where R is the gas constant (in energy units, 8.314 JK-1) T is in K and P is in atm.

(Note that for standard pressure = 1 atm the expression reduces to DG = DG°)

So how do we apply this to a reaction? Consider the synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen:

N2(g) + 3 H2(g) Æ 2 NH3(g)

Recall that, in general:

DG = SnpDGf(prod) - SnrDGf(rct)

and

DG = DNH3(g) + RTlnPNH3(g)

DG = DN2(g) + RTlnPN2(g)

DG = DH2(g) + RTlnPH2(g)

Substituting:

DG = 2(DNH3(g) + RTlnPNH3(g)) - [DN2(g) + RTlnPN2(g) + 3(DH2(g) + RTlnPH2(g))]

Collecting terms:

DG = 2DNH3(g) - DN2(g) - 3DH2(g) + RT(2 lnPNH3(g) - lnPN2(g) - 3 lnPH2(g))

Consolidating and taking advantage of log relationships:

DG = Drxn + RTln{(PNH3(g))2/ (PN2(g))(PH2(g))3}

Thus the expression for the reaction is more complex than for a simple gas, with the necessity to take differences in moles into account as well as pressure.

 

DG and Equilibria

You may have noticed in our treatment of pressure that the final expression included the expression for the Mass Action Quotient for ammonia synthesis:

Mass Action Expression = Q = (PNH3(g))2/ (PN2(g))(PH2(g))3

So we can rewrite the general expression as:

DG = DG° + RTlnQ

This is a very general expression, which works for gases with pressures in the Mass Action Quotient, or any chemical system with moles (or activities) in the Mass Action Quotient.

Now suppose we look at a system at equilibrium, where Q = Keq. Then our expression for free energy becomes:

DG = DG° + RTlnKeq

Of course for a reaction at equilibrium, DG = 0, so we see that:

0 = DG° + RTlnKeq

and,

DG° = - RTlnKeq

So we see that the standard free energy is directly related to the equilibrium constant for a chemical reaction. We can also see that the amount of energy available from a reaction (or which must be put in to make a reaction go) is related to how far the system is from equilibrium!


Syllabus/Schedule
C110 Home

C110 Lecture Notes

© R A Paselk

Last modified 17 September 2003