Humboldt State University ® Department of Chemistry

Richard A. Paselk

Chem 110

General Chemistry

Fall 2003

Lecture Notes::Lec 40_12 December

© R. Paselk 2003
 
     
PREVIOUS  

Nuclear Chemistry

Radioactive Decay, cont.

Radioactivity Demo - Geiger counter and radioactive objects. (Geiger counter overhead). Note differentiation of gamma and beta decay by shielding.

We looked at the three most common forms of decay last time: a-decay (A decreases by 2, Z decreases by 4), b-decay (A constant, Z increases by 1), and g-decay. Can also have positron (positive electron) emission (A constant, Z decreases by 1) and K(inner electron)-capture (A constant, Z decreases by 1). See Table 21.2 in text.

Nuclear Decay Series: The first two reactions we looked at last time demonstrated the beginning of a common phenomena, a nuclear decay series, wherein a decay process involves a series of sequential decays (overhead - note alpha [diagonal] vs. beta [horizontal] decays):

23892U Æ 23490Th + 42He

23490Th Æ 23491Pa + 0-1e

 

Rates of Nuclear Decay

In parallel with chemical systems we've seen in the past, the stability of a nucleus is characterized by two factors. Last time we looked at thermodynamic stability, that is the amount of energy given off when the nucleus decays, and thus how favorable the reaction is. We now will focus on kinetic stability, that is how rapidly a collection of nuclei decays. (Note that for an individual nucleus this is expressed as the probability it will decay during a given time interval. For a long lived species, the probability of decay is very low and vice-versa.)

The decay of nuclides is independent of factors outside the individual nucleus - it is unaffected by environment. This means it must be a first order process in which the rate depends only on the concentration of unstable nuclei. If we think back to chemical kinetics in Chem 109:

Recall for first order decay reactions:

Example: What is the age of a meteorite if it has a ratio of 23892U to 20682Pb of 1:1. t1/2, 23892U = 4.51 x 109 years? Assume the only source of 206Pb is uranium decay.

The first thing we want to do is determine if it has decayed a whole number of half-lives, because if it has the solution becomes trivial. If the current ratio of U:Pb is 1:1, then the original amount of uranium, Uo = U + Pb = 1 + 1 = 2. Excellent, it has decayed a whole number of half=lives!

The uranium has decayed by one half-life and the meteorite is 4.51 x 109 years old.

Example: What is the age of a rock sample if it has a 23892U to 20682Pb ratio of 0.906?

In this case U/Pb = 0.906, and U = 0.906Pb. For Pb = 1, Uo = U + Pb = 1 + 0.906 = 1.906, and we do NOT have a whole number of half-lives. What now?

Since r = -kN, can say ro = -kNo. If we divided both sides of the equation by ro (recall in algebra can do anything we like as long as we do it to both sides) we get:

r/ro = N/No = kN/kNo = 0.906/1.906 = 0.475

Now recall that the integrated rate law is lnN = -kt + lnNo, subtracting initial from final conditions:

lnN - lnNo = -kt -(-kto) + lnNo - lnNo

assuming to = 0, dating from initial time 0

ln(N/No) = -kt

and since t1/2, 23892U = 4.51 x 109 years, can substitute into:

t1/2 = 0.693/k and solve for k

k = 0.693/(4.51 x 109y) = 1.540 x 10-10y-1

Going back and substituting into ln(N/No) = -kt

ln(N/No) = ln(0.475) = -0.7444 = -kt

Finally, rearranging and substituting:

t = -(-0.7444)/k = 0.7444/(1.540 x 10-10y-1) = 4.83 x 109 years.

Carbon-14 dating: The half-life for carbon-14, t1/2, 146C = 5.74 x 103 years. It is quite useful for dating human artifacts etc. over the past 50,000 years or so. However, a number of caveats apply to this use.

 

The material below was not covered F 2003

Nuclear Binding Energy and Nuclear Stability: Note figures in text. Note peaks and abundances in Universe, e.g. Fe, O, C, relatively common because of stability. Note Fission vs. Fusion as energy yielding processes on diagram.

Fusion: Fusion involves the combining of nuclei to create larger nuclides. It can yield an immense amount of energy, and is the source of energy in stars and the H-bomb.

We will look at the most ancient fusion process, used by the oldest stars as well as the Sun for energy production: the Proton-Proton Cycle:

11H + 11H Æ 21H + 01e

11H + 21H Æ 32He

32He + 32He Æ 42He + 211H

32He + 11H Æ 42He + 01e

Late stars such as the Sun can also use the Carbon cycle in which carbon-12 acts as a catalyst to speed the same result.

Fission: Large nuclei can be induced to break into smaller nuclides by neutron bombardment. One of the most important of these process is the fission of 23592U:

23592U + 10n Æ 14156Ba + 9236Kr + 310n

Note that more neutrons are given off than are required. This makes it possible to have a nuclear chain-reaction if the uranium concentration is high enough.

Huge amounts of energy are released in fission reactions. Thus in the fission of 23592U 0.1933 g/mol of mass is converted into energy in its fission to strontium and xenon (an alternate fission path with the release of three neutrons). This corresponds to 2.1 x 1013J/mol, as opposed to 8 x 105J/ml for the combustion of methane. This is approximately 106 times more energy release by fission than combustion on a mass:mass basis. (About 7/8 of this energy is released as KE, the remainder as EM radiation.)

Note terms for nuclear reactions and nuclear reactors:


Syllabus/Schedule
C110 Home

C110 Lecture Notes

© R A Paselk

Last modified 12 December 2003