Wildlife
210 Introduction to Wildlife Conservation and Administration Spring 2002
Dr.
T. Luke George, W152, Ph: 826-3430, email: tlg2@humboldt.edu,
Web
site: www.humboldt.edu/~tlg2, Office Hrs: Mon. 900-1000, Wed 900-1000,
1400-1600
Objective: To provide an introduction to: 1) ecological
concepts and principles, 2) past and current threats to wildlife, 3) the
principal laws and regulations passed to manage and protect wildlife, and, 4)
the agencies that enforce those regulations.
Tentative Lecture
Schedule
Week of |
Topic |
Reading |
|
21 Jan |
Introduction/
Scientific Method |
Ch.
2 |
|
28 |
Ethics and
Responsibilities/ Market Hunting |
pp. 57-59 |
|
Feb 4 |
History of Hunting
Regulations |
pp. 390-392 |
|
11 |
Wildlife Populations-
Models and Natural Regulation |
Ch. 8 (pp. 168-177) |
|
18 |
Wildlife Populations-
Management/Agencies |
pp. 388-392 |
|
25 |
Human Population Growth and
Resource Consumption |
pp. 177-187, 190-196,
202-211 |
|
Mar 4 |
Pollution and Contaminants-
Effects on the Environment |
Ch. 22 |
|
11 |
Ecology and Ecosystems-
Nutrient Cycling |
Ch. 4, 6 (pp. 106-117) |
|
18 |
Spring Break |
|
|
25 |
Ecology and Ecosystems-
Communities/Succession |
Ch. 5 |
|
Apr 1 |
Ecology and Ecosystems-
Regulations/ Agencies |
Ch. 7 |
|
8 |
Land Conservation and the
Extinction Crisis |
Ch. 16 (pp. 370-388) |
|
15 |
Habitat, Niche, Effects of
Habitat Loss |
pp. 85-98 |
|
22 |
Land Conservation-
Regulations and Agencies |
Ch. 17, pp. 392-393 |
|
29 |
Global Environmental
Problems |
Ch. 20 |
|
May 6 |
Conserving Biodiversity/
Sustainability |
Ch. 24 |
Text: Raven,
P. H., L. R. Berg, and G. B. Johnson. 2001. Environment, Third Edition.
Harcourt College Publishers. New York.
Other reading: Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County almanac. Oxford
University Press. London.
Goodall, J. 1999. Reason for hope.
Warner Books. New York.
Grading: Your final grade will be based on 4 midterm exams
worth 100 points each, and your participation in the discussion (100 pts) for a
total of 500 points for the course. The final exam (100 pts) is optional and,
if higher, will replace your lowest midterm exam score. Missed exams will be given a 0. Letter
grades will be assigned based on your percentage of total points: > 90 A,
80-90 B, 70-80 C, 60-70 D, <60 F.
Plus and minus grades will be assigned. See last page for extra credit
assignment.
Dates of midterm exams: Exam 1- 13 Feb., Exam 2- 13 Mar., Exam 3- 17 April,
Exam 4- 8 May.
Final Exam: Friday 17 May
0800-0950. The final exam (100 pts) is optional and, if higher, will replace
your lowest midterm exam score.
Discussion schedule:
|
Date |
Topic |
Reading |
|
25
Jan. |
Introduction/Assign
Groups |
|
|
1
Feb |
The
role of science in decision-making. Point
for discussion How
do we make decisions about environmental problems in the face of scientific
uncertainty? |
Zehr,
S. C. 1999 |
|
8
Feb. |
Discussion of group
presentations. Come with title of
presentation. |
|
|
15
Feb. |
What is the role of humans
in the natural world? Point for discussion: “Unbridled
self-indulgence on the part of one generation without regard to future ones
is the modus operandi of biological evolution and may be regarded as rational
behavior.” |
Murdy. 1975.
(on reserve) |
|
22
Feb. |
What
is the “Tragedy of the Commons” and can we overcome it in human societies? Point
for discussion: How
do we balance the need to regulate the use of natural resources with the
rights of individuals to use their property? |
Harding,
G. 1968 (on reserve) |
|
1
March |
How should wildlife work be
funded in the U.S.? Point for discussion: Current
funding for wildlife work is about 55% from hunters (75% in states) and 45%
from general funds. Should this be
changed and if so how? |
|
|
8
March |
Under what conditions
should wildlife pests be controlled? Point for discussion: Because
all wildlife have intrinsic value, none of them should be controlled solely
for human needs. |
Mitchell
(on reserve) |
|
15
March |
How
should we decide to put aside land for protection? Point
for discussion Land
should only be set aside if its protection results in greater human benefit
than human detriment. |
Video
(in lecture) Kiester (on reserve) |
|
|
|
|
|
22
March |
Spring
Break |
|
|
29
March |
Group
discussion 1 |
|
|
5
April |
Group
discussion 2 |
|
|
12
April |
Group
discussion 3 |
|
|
19
April |
Group
discussion 4 |
|
|
26
April |
Group
discussion 5 |
|
|
3
May |
Group
discussion 6 |
|
|
10
May |
What
are reasonable personal goals and responsibilities for a thoughtful
individual in today’s world? |
|
General Discussions: I will lead the discussions during the first half of
the semester. Each student is responsible for reading the material, submitting
one question or discussion point, and participating in the discussion.
Questions: You must turn in one written question or discussion
point at the start of every discussion (except when your group is leading the
discussion). The question should demonstrate your understanding of the material
and provide a point that can be discussed by others in the class. An example of
what I am looking for is something like this “The author assumes that the
carrying capacity of an environment is constant for a particular species. How
does this apply to humans who can manipulate their environment and thereby
increase or decrease the carrying capacity?” Questions like “What does carrying
capacity mean?” are not appropriate and will not receive full credit.
Grading of Discussion: Your grade in the discussion will be based on your
participation (40%), your questions (30%), and your group presentation
(30%). Your participation score will be
based on attendance and your contribution to the discussions. The points you receive in the discussion
will be added to your points from the exams to determine your final grade in
the class.
Extra Credit: Summarize the environmental ethic espoused either in
Sand County Almanac or Reason for Hope (see other reading on first page of
syllabus) and relate the ideas to your own ethics. The paper must be no longer
than 3 pages, typewritten, double spaced, 12 point font. You may earn up to 30
extra credit points. The number of points assigned will be based on content
(ideas in the book are adequately summarized), clarity of the writing, and
grammar/spelling.